After conservative commentator Candace Owens’ dismissal from the Daily Wire, her dissident side slowly diminished, aside from some “degeneracy” remarks. It is almost as if she is tepid to be independent, leaning towards the mainstream.

Anyone and everybody in the news media knows well that questioning Israel or Jews is a “no-no” and will render you canceled. Owens, among other black conservatives, including the Hodge Twins, thought she could win the gamble.

The Hodge Twins (@hodgetwins) have joined forces with Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO), railing against Israel, supposed "antisemitism," and the Daily Wire.

Black conservatives remain true to America First as the biggest critics of foreign intervention. pic.twitter.com/BCAoll5Jad

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) March 31, 2024

Now that the Daily Wire has placed a gag order on Owens, it is very unlikely we will see the earth-shattering debate between her and establishment con Ben Shapiro. So then, where is she headed? Will she be independent? Or will she bow and return to the mainstream media?

This isn’t accurate. I wasn’t following Charlie and I definitely did not delete any photos.

We have a lot of discussions off line and we’ve both grown a lot since the early days of TPUSA.

There’s just no beef between us.

— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) May 9, 2024

The go-to-news-aggregator, AF Post, posted that Owens had unfollowed TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk and deleted all images of the two on her social media accounts. She refuted the claim by saying, “We have a lot of discussions offline, and we’ve both grown a lot since the early days of TPUSA. There’s just no beef between us.”

America First Candace Owens Strides Past Neocon Establishment

Kirk is known for his staunch pro-Israel stance and had not supported Owens when she was heavily ridiculed for alleged antisemitism. She has also reposted from several previous colleges, like Matt Walsh, who did not come to her defense. It appears she doesn’t want to burn bridges and wants to remain in the mainstream while somehow retaining her Dissident Right voice. That seems wholly unlikely unless she starts up a new brand.

Surprising from an outlet that has no problem doxxing Christian Nationalists.

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) May 8, 2024

On Wednesday, Owens posted a Wall Street Journal editorial advocating for Christian Nationalists. What is ironic here is that this is a News Corp outlet. News Corp is Zionist to the core and has had no problem in the past blasting the Dissident Right and Christian Nationalism. For Owens, it seems very difficult to realize her stance is diametrically opposed to the people she praises and the outlets she promotes.

We got you, Candace @NationalFile where Christ is King and America’s First. https://t.co/dGN4Xc3eYh

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) March 24, 2024

It is too early to predict where she is going with her career, but it is easy to see that she, in a sense, manipulates the Dissident Right for her own defense. Groypers and the Dissident Right act as a collective and never fold. With that, this audience works toward her advantage.

X Reinstates Paleocon Commentator Nicholas J. Fuentes

If Owens was truly devoted to the America First cause, she would help her supporters in media — the columnists and reporters that backed her and became blacklisted, rather than elevating content from those who referred to her as an antisemite.

Hey folks!

Turning Point Action is hosting our MASSIVE People’s Convention in Detroit this June 14-16

Thousands of patriots will be in attendance and we have an incredible speaking roster including President Trump and many others!

Check out https://t.co/fKANJfbHZT to register! pic.twitter.com/bwxrdqpCO4

— Gabe Guidarini (@GabeGuidarini) May 9, 2024

Another perspective is that she is simply trying to retain those contacts to build her brand in the future. Dissident Right or America First outlets are continually dwindling, but this could be a big chance to even the score.

Candace Owens Takes Aim at the Jewish Lobby

There’s a lot of hope for Candace Owens, but understanding the dynamics of news media puts her at odds with America First. The question is whether she will compromise in the mainstream and be forced to dismiss America First conservativism. Or will she open an outlet that will be truly free speech and allow the canceled to have a chance at their journalistic profession? It may take months to find out, and certainly don’t expect an appearance at AFPACIV — she’s booked for the adjacent event, Turning Point Action.

Matt Walsh: ‘Bow Before Israel (unless you’re an anti-Semite)!’

Adam Kinzinger, the disgraced outgoing Illinois Republican Congressman who has been agitating against the America First movement, actually attended the video deposition. Kinzinger is leaving Congress due to lack of popular support for his anti-Donald Trump, pro-establishment views. Kinzinger did not get the opportunity to try to damage Fuentes, because Fuentes came armed with a valuable weapon of self-preservation: the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which allows Americans to avoid self-incrimination.

Nick Fuentes, the proprietor of the Cozy streaming service and leader of the Groypers, is building a movement largely comprised of politically incorrect anti-establishment young men who reject Zionist supremacy, feminist badgering and anti-White racism in American society. Fuentes gained national prominence during the “Groyper Wars,” in which his followers confronted conservative pundit Charlie Kirk about Kirk’s advocacy for stapling green cards to foreigners’ diplomas. The GOP and the professional conservative movement largely push for mass “legal” immigration, which dilutes and dis-empowers the native-born American population.

As Patrick Howley famously reported for NATIONAL FILE in 2021: Republican Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger’s office offered an internship to a Russian immigrant beauty queen who met Kinzinger through her internship application. She then dated Kinzinger for about four months and sent Kinzinger racy photos at his request, according to extensive communications between the woman and a NATIONAL FILE source. The woman, Olga Kambod, provided sexually charged and volatile 2018 text messages between herself and a phone number that matches Kinzinger’s former phone number on publicly available records. Kambod also provided emails from Kinzinger’s congressional staff discussing internship duties.

Rep. Adam Kinzinger, a frequent critic of the America First movement, became angry at Olga Kambod after she accused him of suffering from “low levels of testosterone,” according to messages Kambod provided to our source. Kambod did not end up serving as an intern for Kinzinger. Olga Kambod was subjected to an over-the-phone intimidation campaign including from a caller who identified himself as “Capitol Police” to silence her about her relationship with the congressman after Kinzinger began dating his current wife, according to Kambod.  “In my opinion he doesn’t respect women,” Olga Kambod confided to our source. “I don’t think that his district will be proud of him if they know that he is abusing his power and using police for improper purpose such as personal retaliation.”

Olga Kambod, who reportedly graduated from law school and worked for a criminal defense attorney, was recently in the news for surviving an acid attack that left permanent scarring on one side of her face. Olga Kambod, who has a public Facebook page and also a personal Facebook profile on which she posts as “Olga Alexia,” provided extensive information and documentation to NATIONAL FILE’s source to verify her identity…”

Trump hating Democrats, rappers, the liberal press, and Shad White all have one thing in common: They need scapegoats.

In professional wrestling, the bad guy is called the “heel.”

In the world of political theater playing out on ESPN, Twitter, and down in Mississippi, the stars have aligned, and they’ve got their man. His name is Brett Favre.

While Shad White has generally kept his comments about Mr. Favre — Mississippi’s own Hall of Fame NFL football hero — in bounds, he’s been just loose enough with his language to send clear dog whistle messages to his comrades in the leftist media, indicating that the pile-on is afoot.

And boy have they piled on. (More on Shad White’s proximity to corruption later in the article.)

Blatant Defamation Used to Further Narratives

“Gillie Da King,” a former rapper turned Barstool podcast host, tweeted recently, “The difference between being a white man and a black man Brett Favre stole 77 million and nobody’s sayin shit.”

This completely false tweet has gotten nearly 20,000 likes. No one has ever even accused Brett of stealing $77 million before, it appears Gillie made the number up out of whole cloth.

Gillie isn’t alone. Social media and sports outlets have been littered with smears about Favre. The Daily Caller reported recently that text messages reveal that a reporter was “grossly misleading” in an article for Front Office Sports about Brett Favre’s role in the deaths of dogs in lab experiments.

The author of the article, A.J. Perez, publicly claimed that there would have been “no dog test” without Brett, while privately saying Favre had “no role” in the testing.  Perez, a liberal, has attacked former President Donald Trump online.
The sports reporter is just one of many journalists to dishonestly attack Brett in recent months. Many have claimed that Brett “stole” welfare funds. SiriusXM host Qashim Rashid, for example, got over 51,000 likes on a tweet that said, “Brett Favre knowingly stole $5M in welfare.”

These attacks aren’t grounded in fact. Brett worked with state officials to get a $5 million grant from the Mississippi Community Education Center (MCEC) that was approved by the attorney’s general office to build an athletic facility at his alma mater the University of Southern Mississippi.

Favre also received $1.1 million from MCEC for recording radio ads. Once Favre found out it was welfare funds, he swiftly returned the money. Favre has denied knowing it was welfare funds and the state auditor Shad White has repeatedly acknowledged that there is no evidence Favre knew it was federal welfare funds.

“Now, whether or not Mr. Favre knew that this money was specifically coming from Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, there are no documents out in the public right now that suggest that,” White told Fox News.

White also said in a 2020 statement: “I want to applaud Mr. Favre for his good faith effort to make this right and make the taxpayers and TANF families whole. To date, we have seen no records indicating Mr. Favre knew that TANF was the program that served as the source of the money he was paid.”

Still, Favre gets bashed in the press. After Davante Adams pushed a photographer to the ground, former NFL player and current ESPN commentator Robert Griffin III tweeted, “Davante Adams pushing someone down and Draymond punching his teammate were wrong. But lets focus our attention on Brett Favre and the evil of stealing millions from the poorest people in our country in Mississippi.”

Another former NFL player Charles James II tweeted, “They reporting more on Davante Adams pushing over the camera man than Brett Favre stealing from the poor but I guess I’m tripping.”

Favre never stole from the poor. The state auditor Shad White, who has gone on CNN to try and get famous off of Favre, noted in a recent interview that there is no expectation that people who received grants from MCEC should have known it was misappropriated welfare funds.
Anchor Byron Brown asked White, “When recipients receive the money, is it incumbent on them to know where this money’s coming from when they apply for a grant like this?”

White responded: “Well I’ll give you an example of why it’s very difficult sometimes for recipients to know the rules around the money.  One of the expenditures that we saw when we examined how TANF money had been spent, was an expenditure buying an ad in the Clarion Ledger. So, if you asked yourself, well is it the Clarion Ledger’s job to know that TANF money could not be spent on an ad in the Clarion Ledger?  The answer is no, obviously.  The Clarion Ledger doesn’t have folks who are TANF experts…So, really there are some situations where the end user can very easily argue, ‘No I’m not supposed to know the rules you’re the one who’s supposed to know the rules.'”So if a newspaper is not supposed to know that the money they received was in fact federal welfare funds, why is a retired NFL player supposed to know? Favre is being smeared because he is a proud conservative. The Washington Post made this clear with a recent column entitled: “Ron DeSantis isn’t the future of the GOP. Brett Favre is.”

Shad White Needs Brett Favre.

Without Favre, his former boss, and the Governor who appointed him would receive all the focus of the Nancy New non-profit scandal that bubbled into the press a few years ago.

Shad White’s headline-grabbing investigation into TANF fraud achieved levels of notoriety rarely seen, given the relatively small amounts of dollars involved.

To achieve such notoriety, Auditor White’s strategy hinged one man: Brett Favre.

Without Favre, Shad’s pedestrian investigation into Nancy New’s and John Davis’s fraud would’ve remained just that: pedestrian.

But Shad White wanted headlines. So he went camera hunting like a coon dog.

With Favre, Shad has just the heel he needs. He gets to pretend he’s fighting hard to uncover unprecedented levels of corruption while at the same time claim that he’s working hard to find cash for Mississippi’s poor.

Shad certainly has earned himself a lot of camera time for a five million dollar gymnasium that was funded through a non-profit.
One wonders whether Shad has any other more lucrative instances of fraud he’s not making so much noise about.

Mississippi’s Long History of Corruption in the Auditor’s Office

Shad White cast Phil Bryant in the role of “whistleblower” in his roll-out of his office’s investigation into Nancy New’s non-profit scandal that also embroiled Dept. of Human Services Director John Davis.

Davis, who Phil Bryant appointed to the Human Services post, has pleaded guilty.

Former Governor Phil Bryant also appointed Shad White to serve as Mississippi’s State Auditor after scandal-plagued Stacey Pickering left the auditor’s office for a cushy job at the state Veterans’ Affairs board.

So close was Shad White’s connection to former Governor Phil Bryant, three State Auditors questioned White’s involvement in the Bryant investigation.

Shad White, for his part, is content to use loose language to let Brett Favre out to dry.

Mississippi has a long history of corruption connected to Bryant, Pickering, and Barbour.

Pickering left office after receiving scrutiny behind the scenes for his involvement with no-bid contracts doled out in connection with Haley Barbour-connected Howard Industries, which was heavily tied to human trafficking and importing illegal aliens.

Last year, the CDC controversially changed the definition of vaccine. This left us wondering whether human immunodeficiency virus, otherwise known as HIV, could now possibly be considered a “vaccine” based on the CDC’s new definition of the term.

In September, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) quietly changed the definition of the word “vaccine” as people continued to get infected with COVID-19 despite being vaccinated.

The definition change confused some, as mainstream media pundits, health officials, and government leaders had once optimistically assured Americans that the vaccines would prevent individuals from contracting the virus. This, the experts once said, would effectively put an end to the COVID-19 pandemic and allow us all to go back to our normal lives.

“The totality of the available data provides clear evidence that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine may be effective in preventing COVID-19,” announced the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December of 2020, after it issued the first emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, adding that the “vaccine was 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 disease among these clinical trial participants…”

“Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person,” MSNBC host Rachel Maddow said on March 29, 2021.

“A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, the virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else,” she added. “It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people.”

Let’s go back in time to 3/29/21

“No we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person… The virus does not infect them…It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to get more people.” pic.twitter.com/kwsDIPYl2E

— Aaron Ginn (@aginnt) December 26, 2021

“You’re not going to — you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations,” President Joe Biden said during a CNN Town Hall in July 2021.

https://twitter.com/MAGA_Pendragon/status/1468894054528262147?s=20

The experts were mistaken, so they changed the definition

In the end, claims that vaccination prevents individuals from catching or spreading COVID-19 were ultimately proven to be false.

Today, many Americans are faced with the reality that the injections failed to do what was initially advertised. Instead, the experts tell us that the vaccines will reduce the severity and length of COVID-19 symptoms.

“What [COVID-19 vaccines] can’t do anymore is prevent transmission,” admitted CDC Director Rochelle Walensky.

FAILURE….

CDC Director:
“Our vaccines are working exceptionally well…but what they can't do anymore is prevent transmission."https://t.co/a7jAPSyrAk

— ZZZ (@AskMeLaterOn) January 14, 2022

“We know that the two doses of a vaccine offer very limited protection — if any,” Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla would later admit.

https://twitter.com/risemelbourne/status/1481050107332202496?s=20

On August 26, 2021, the definition of “vaccine” on the CDC website was “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.”

As of September 7, 2021, the new definition of “vaccine” on the CDC website is “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

Could the act of contracting the HIV virus be considered a “preparation?”

The CDC does not consider a vaccine to be a “product” as it once did. Now, a vaccine is officially considered, by the CDC, to be a “preparation.”

The definition of “preparation” is “something prepared, manufactured, or compounded.” The HIV virus was reportedly and seemingly “prepared” by nature, over time, as a result of multiple cross-species transmission of simian immunodeficiency viruses naturally infecting primates in Africa.

From the National Institutes of Health:

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) of humans is caused by two lentiviruses, human immunodeficiency viruses types 1 and 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2). Here, we describe the origins and evolution of these viruses, and the circumstances that led to the AIDS pandemic. Both HIVs are the result of multiple cross-species transmissions of simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIVs) naturally infecting African primates.

Therefore, one could ascertain that a preparation can be administered via direct injection, orally, and in some cases, suppository, so long as that preparation eventually enters the bloodstream.

HIV transmission also requires the virus to enter the bloodstream, meaning that – with a Fauci-style stretch of the English language – the act of contracting HIV could technically be considered a “preparation.”

According to HIV.gov, transmission occurs when the HIV contained in blood, semen, pre-seminal fluid, rectal fluids, vaginal fluids, or breast milk, gets into the bloodstream of an HIV-negative person through a mucous membrane – found in the rectum, vagina, mouth, or tip of the penis, open cuts or sores; or by direct injection.

“Stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases” – What does this really mean?

According to the new CDC definition of vaccine, such a “preparation” is used to “stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases” in general.

No longer do vaccines “produce immunity to a specific disease” as the CDC previously said they did.

Stimulation is defined by Oxford Languages as the “raising of levels of physiological or nervous activity in the body or any biological system,” or the “encouragement of something to make it develop or become more active.”

The Oxford definition does not distinguish whether or not that the increased levels of physiological activity, or developmental encouragement, provide any benefit, or pose any threat to said body or biological system.

To add, the current definition of vaccine does not distinguish whether or not the “preparation” would “stimulate” the body’s immune response against disease in a positive or negative way.

The old definition of vaccine provided better context to the use of the word “stimulate.” Stimulation of an individual’s immune system, through a vaccine, was previously stated to be for the specific purpose of producing immunity to a specific disease.

For many, that would have been the main point of getting a vaccine in the first place.

Without conferring immunity, there is no positive connotation to the “vaccine” definition put forward by the CDC. We are merely talking about an “immune response against diseases.”

Simply put, the CDC’s new version of “vaccine” may as well read: “Something that affects how your immune system reacts against diseases and infections after it enters your bloodstream.”

Thus far, HIV fits the bill.

In the case of HIV, when someone is infected, the virus finds the individual’s white blood cells. Once it does, the HIV then gets inside the cell and makes copies of itself. Then, HIV kills the cell and the new HIV copies find other white blood cells to invade, and the cycle starts again.

There is currently no cure for HIV. When the virus enters the body, it remains there for life. Thus, when infected, HIV becomes a permanent factor of that body’s physiology.

Thus, HIV could technically be considered a “vaccine” using CDC’s new definition

In other words, HIV viruses further develop, increase in quantity and activity, or are otherwise stimulated upon entering the human bloodstream – thus becoming a permanent physiological feature of the infected individual.

This viral “stimulation” ultimately damages the human immune system’s response against infections and diseases, and without treatment, can lead to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).

One could view the HIV virus as a “vaccine” using the CDC’s new definition. Only, the “preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases” does it in a counterproductive, destructive, and often lethal fashion.

HIV compared to COVID-19 vaccine booster “immune system fatigue”

It is generally understood that people living with HIV are more prone to other infections and diseases as a result of the damage done to their immune systems.

The CDC states that “HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) is a virus that attacks the body’s immune system.”

Similarly to the HIV virus, COVID-19 vaccine “booster” injections can potentially lead to what was described by experts as “immune system fatigue,” and actually harm the body’s ability to fight coronavirus, and ostensibly, other diseases.

As Israel weighed a fourth COVID-19 vaccine injection for their population, the government was warned by members of their advisory panel “that the plan could backfire, because too many shots might cause a sort of immune system fatigue, compromising the body’s ability to fight the coronavirus,” National File reported in December.

Nearly two weeks later, European Union regulators echoed similar concerns, warning that “frequent Covid-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune system and may not be feasible,” adding that “doses every four months could eventually weaken the immune system and tire out people.”

Neither groups of scientists provided details as to precisely how the injections would cause damage to individual’s immune systems, but it is safe to say that the developments could be cause for concern.

According to the Israeli government as of yesterday, 125,000 new COVID cases have been reported over the past two days despite the nation ultimately deciding to roll out the fourth injection for their highly vaccinated population.

Following high profile purges of conservative public figures, some may remember Laura Loomer, the deplatformed Republican candidate for U.S. House in Florida who once chained herself to Twitter’s headquarters, as a warning that congressional Republicans should have heard.

Loomer was banned from Twitter in 2018, something relatively unheard of at the time. Twitter decided her tweets were no longer fit for public consumption after she dared to call “Squad” member Rep. Ilhan Omar “anti-Jewish.”

Soon after, Loomer made national news when she handcuffed herself to Twitter’s headquarters in protest. Twitter was not amused.

Loomer ultimately sued Twitter, and the lawsuit failed in 2020.

Twitter remained stone faced when Loomer challenged its policy a different way in 2020: She ran for the U.S. House, and Twitter had promised at the time that elected officials and candidates would not be banned from its platform.

The big tech giant changed that rule as Loomer and other controversial figures, including Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, announced their plans to run for office. They would remain banned from Twitter.

Apparently, society judged, the risk of having Laura Loomer on social media was greater than the risk of having her in the U.S. House.

Regardless, Loomer went on to win a six-way primary contest to represent the Republican Party in 2020.

She broke party fundraising records for her district without using Twitter or Facebook to solicit donors. She was even endorsed by 45th President President Trump, who lives in the district and almost certainly voted for Loomer as his House representative.

Those who watched Loomer’s ban play out – alongside the bans of Gavin McInnes, Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, and Paul Joseph Watson – likely experienced far less shock than the uninitiated when Twitter, Facebook, and a litany of other websites censored President Trump following the events of January 6, 2021.

The Republicans, having lost their majority in the U.S. Senate, having failed to secure the U.S. House, and being forced to accept the reality of losing the White House to the Democrats, suddenly realized that big tech might pose a threat.

Since President Trump was banned, some Republicans have made opposition to big tech a part of their messaging. Gutting Section 230 protections for big tech companies has become a talking point, and National File has spoken to two sources who believe some Senate Democrats may be willing to budge on the issue should Republicans retake the House in 2022.

Still, some say this may be a boon to big tech. They warn that tech giants will be able to handle lawsuits generated by the loss of Section 230 protections, while alt tech companies Gab, Gettr, and Parler would likely suffer disproportionately.

Many conservatives have also created accounts on Gab, Parler, GETTR, Telegram, and other alt tech platforms that either do not censor legal speech, or censor it to a milder degree.

Loomer, meanwhile, has continued to confront the big tech giants even as she mostly posts to Telegram, Gab, and Gettr.

She was recently seen levying accusations at former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey in public as he spoke at a Bitcoin event.

https://youtu.be/aFd5zlw13FU

Still, receiving political pressure due to the COVID-19 pandemic, social media companies have escalated their heavy handed tactics and banned Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s personal Twitter and Facebook accounts.

The tech giants had judged Greene guilty of spreading COVID-19 misinformation.

Greene, who previously campaigned with Loomer and urged Floridians to elect her to the U.S. House so that she might confront big tech giants, has since become a lightning rod for tech censorship.

However, despite her warning about tech censorship four years ago, many of the conservatives carrying Greene’s banner still seem wary of admitting that Loomer was right.

“I’ve been demanding Republicans hold big tech accountable since 2018,” Loomer told National File. “It’s nice that the Republican Party has finally decided to join me.”

She added, “Perhaps they can be intellectually honest with themselves and also recognize the censorship and deplatforming of all Republican candidates, even those who are considered America First outsiders.”

“Let me remind you of Kevin McCarthy’s own words,” Loomer mused. “‘The Republican Party is one big tent.'”

Rep. Kevin McCarthy, the top House Republican, made the statement while defending anti-Trump Republican Rep. Liz Cheney.

Loomer is correct to point out that the issue is largely political. Just this week, President Joe Biden urged the tech giants to censor “COVID-19 misinformation and disinformation.”

“I make a special appeal to social media companies and media outlets,” said Joe Biden. “Please deal with the misinformation and disinformation that’s on your shows, it has to stop.”

Joe Biden is driving home a fact Democrats have known for years: Social media has the ability to limit and shape public discourse.

Democrats also know that Silicon Valley overwhelming favors them, something proven in publicly accessible political donor information.

If Republicans had paid attention when Loomer was banned, when the Republican Party still held the House, Senate, and the White House, it seems likely this could have been avoided.

Even two years later, had Republicans paid attention in 2020, when Loomer was banned while running for public office and Republican Party still held the Senate and the White House, it seems likely this could have been avoided.

Instead, the Republican Party’s refusal to take action while in office has created an environment where big tech is able to punish them for violating ideological purity tests with impunity.

The ban of Greene, seen through this lens, is only the latest result of this environment, and it is likely a harbinger of what to expect from big tech companies between now and the midterm elections slated for November of this year.

Loomer has since filed to run for Congress again in 2022, and remains the only known candidate to be banned by Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and Stripe, the payment processor officially endorsed by the Republican Party.

She is challenging Republican incumbent Rep. Daniel Webster for his seat.

A New York magazine writer named Benjamin Hart wrote a piece entitled “Johnson & Johnson & Regret” in which he complains about being left out of the Biden regime’s initial booster shot rollout because he got the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, whereas people vaccinated with other brands get to have booster shots. In one of the saddest passages in any article ever written in the English language, Hart writes that “some of us have taken matters into our own hands and sought out bootleg boosters at pharmacies by pretending to be unvaccinated.”

Benjamin Hart writes in an actual article published on the New York magazine website: “Never mind that a growing body of evidence shows that we could use another dose more than the Pfizer Pfanatics or Moderna Mafia — that breakthrough infections are at least somewhat more common among one-dose recipients than our smugly double-dosed compatriots, even if hospitalizations remain exceedingly rare.”

Hart adds, “The small size of our cohort, plus the timeline of U.S. vaccine approvals (J&J was last on that score, natch), meant that data was scarce for large swathes of this spring and summer. And despite being in real need of some direction, it has often felt as if we’ve been cast out of the pandemic narrative altogether — like we’re the Generation X of vaccine recipients. Even insentient systems treat us shabbily: A J&J-dosed co-worker reported that New York’s Excelsior app didn’t recognize his vaccination site as legitimate until he called a confused-but-ultimately-helpful human to complain”

“Facing this continual snubbery, some of us have taken matters into our own hands and sought out bootleg boosters at pharmacies by pretending to be unvaccinated. (“Uh, yes, I’ve been hearing more about this coronavirus thing, and it sure sounds concerning! One of your finest Moderna shots, please!”)” (New York magazine passage ends)

This is what happens when globalist institutions inflict mass paranoia on the useful idiots in society and expect slavish servitude in return. The New York magazine article unintentionally provides a window into the darkest and most pathetic corners of the human psyche. In times like these, we must realize that some of our fellow humans are so obedient, so devoid of critical thinking, so tethered to a system taking advantage of them, that they might simply never see reality the way normal people do.

Pity is appropriate. Revulsion is warranted. Maybe it’s time for healthy unvaccinated people to simply demand that the vaccine cultists stay six feet away from us.

A mindless and heartless Biden- Harris Administration cancels Trump’s program to assist The Remembrance Project’s grieving Angel Families, whose loved ones were violently killed by illegal aliens.

The Biden-Harris administration’s prejudice against and hostility toward U.S. citizens, especially persons of color, was no more clearly on display than when, earlier this week, the administration announced that it would greatly alter the Office of V.O.I.C.E. (Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement), which was conceived in 2015 by this Latina and others with “America First Latinos” (an initiative of www.TheRemembranceProject.org) in order to assist Americans whose loved ones were killed by illegal aliens. Read Latinos’ letter to all governors.

In response to the Latinos’ request and in keeping his promise to this author, President Donald Trump created the Office of V.O.I.C.E. in 2017, which provided vital information to victimized American families on the potential release of their loved ones’ killers, as well as to help victim families to navigate through a complex judicial system, rigged toward helping the illegal alien killers, rather than assisting victimized citizens.

Biden’s planned destruction of Latino/of Color Communities.

The Biden’s Transition Team partook in over 200 meetings with federal agents along the southern border. They knew exactly what would happen if they canceled President Trump’s immigration policies that greatly reduced crime and illegal crossings, giving much relief to the majority Latino population living along the border. Exactly what Biden was told would happen, is happening – a huge influx of illegal aliens.

The planned border crisis is taking an enormous toll on Latino Communities. Crime has exponentially spiked, school lockdowns are terrorizing children – the majority of whom are Latino children, bail-outs are taking place in downtown plazas of small once-quiet towns, the gotaways – those that most likely have criminal records in their countries are making their way to unassuming residential communities, criminal trespassers wandering about and knocking on doors at all hours of the day, the depletion of resources which should be utilized by tax-paying citizens in need, all of the aforementioned are devastating to these already impoverished communities struggling to survive.

The border invasion is no laughing matter to Americans.

More evidence of the intentional infliction of such cruelty is Vice President Kamala Harris’ refusal to visit the border and address this crisis. In fact, Harris only announced a plan to visit the border after President Trump announced his own plans to visit. Harris’s cackling laughter of a response when asked if she plans to visit the border is a sign of this administration’s disdain and disrespect. I assure you, this is no laughing matter to Latinos.

Clearly, Biden is enriching his uber-rich donors at the expense of America’s poor, millions of whom are minority Blacks and Hispanics. His new anti-persons-of-color program to assist illegals to invade America in a scale never seen before exposes a deeply rooted prejudice and a racist mentality, because, assuming he remembers this; unskilled illegals hurt America’s unskilled working poor and small business owners more than any other demographic in America.

Latinos who are bearing the brunt of Biden-Harris’ attacks speak out.

Under Biden, the border is wide open, giving illegal aliens’ unfettered access into the United States. Nearly two (2) million illegal aliens have invaded America between January and May of this year. Sheriff Joe Martinez, Val Verde County,stated that crime dropped to “nothing” after President Trump’s border wall was installed and the federal government began its enforcement of our existing immigration laws. Under Biden, the sheriff also added that the Mexican cartels are raking in $25 million a week on human smuggling in Val Verde and Maverick Counties.

Angel Mom Marie Herrera Vega, who resides near the border, said, “As a mother of Fallen Border Patrol Agent Javier “Harvey” Vega, Jr., who was murdered by illegal aliens, Biden-Harris’ act of such dishonor to our loved ones is a slap in the face. I especially take it personally as a Latina whose family entered the U.S. the right way. Biden diligently works to protect illegal aliens with a total disregard for the people they should be working for and protecting. This is a knife in our hearts by an administration which shows such hatred toward American families. It’s simply beyond comprehension. I have no words to describe the devastation we feel.”

Frank Lopez, Jr., a Del Rio ordained chaplain and retired Border Patrol stated, “Val Verde County, over 80% Hispanic, is on the US-Mexico border and everyday we see the alarming demographic makeup of the tide of illegal aliens. Over half are young men, of military age and optimum physical shape, who are even raising the concern of Border Patrol Agents and other law enforcement officials. Americans should be questioning their true intent and the threat they present to the safety of our families and our communities.”

Alma Perez Jackson, President Juan Seguin Society, www.JuanSeguinSociety.org, said, “Residents of border towns are feeling the negative effects of bad policy enacted by the Biden-Harris administration’s planned influx of illegal crossings. The disastrous results not only impact our citizens and our law enforcement, but also impact the illegal aliens who end up in further illegal activity, eg, servitude, drug trafficking and sex trafficking. Hispanics are becoming more involved in order to stop the lawlessness. Without knowledge of how or what to do…the suffering will continue. We must be pro-active at communicating with those elected to represent us and we must be informed on issues to be effective. America is worth saving. There is no other nation that comes close to this God given country. Know who you vote for!”

Our saving grace: America’s U.S. Constitution, divinely inspired by God.

The fact that Biden-Harris have kicked American Latinos to the curb in order to cater to illegal aliens begs the question: What angst does the Biden-Harris Administration,and establishment Republicans, for that matter; have against America’s Latinos that they choose to punish Latinos?

In order to stop the war against Hispanic Americans – and all Americans – we must all demand the Biden-Harris Administration adhere to our divinely inspired United States Constitution. And, demand that all elected officials follow their oaths of office by which they swear to uphold our Constitution.

This is a guest op-ed from Maria Espinoza, the National Director for The Remembrance Project. The views expressed in this op-ed may not necessarily reflect those of National File or its editorial team, however, National File is happy to offer Espinoza the opportunity to share her valid concerns about the recent actions of the Biden administration related to the U.S. border and illegal immigration.

National File presents a new documentary focusing on the migrant crisis in the United Kingdom, as the United States grapples with how to respond to its own.

At its narrowest point, there is only 20 miles between Great Britain and France across the English Channel. The journey over the waves is one that many have taken through the years, from the Romans, to the Saxons, to the Normans. Great generals have looked across the waters from the continent to the island nation, but not in a thousand years have any of them managed to conquer the land that lies beyond the sea.

But over the past few years, the port of Dover has become the landing point for a new type of invasion – not one of armies, but of migrants from all across the world, seeking a better life, who make the crossing that neither Napoleon nor Hitler could manage to complete.

https://twitter.com/JackHadders/status/1415780376753102851

Those making the illegal journey are not turned away from these shores. Their crossing is facilitated by the British government, who rescue them from sinking dinghies, and give them shelter once they make it to the land. So-called Conservative politicians, who crow loudly in the press about reducing migration, spend taxpayers money on housing and feeding thousands who break the law, while leaving the native homeless population to starve on the streets.

Late last year, my team and I spent days down on the south coast, documenting the crossings, finding out the story on the ground from locals, and even talking to the migrants themselves about the life they left behind.

“Destination Dover” comes as the United States is facing a similar crisis of its own. National File reported this week on disturbing footage shot from a helicopter by a sitting GOP Senator, which shows multiple groups of illegal migrants streaming across a Texas portion of the U.S.-Mexico border amid a growing national security crisis throughout the southern border region.

Watch the full trailer for National File’s “Destination Dover”. The full documentary will launch in the coming days.

There was nothing overtly political about Super Bowl LIV compared to previous Super Bowls, but that didn’t stop the contingent of People Who Are Professionally Mad Online, i.e, Twitter users, from crying about “racism.”

The Washington Redskins and Atlanta Braves have long born the brunt of accusations of racism thrown faround by those who are mad online, but the reaction to the Kansas City Chiefs’ 31-20 Super Bowl win over the 49ers proves the new Super Bowl champions are also squarely in the crosshairs of woke Twitter.

I don’t understand how the hell anyone still finds this shit acceptablehttps://t.co/K0XZ5x0tP1

— tanya tagaq (@tagaq) February 2, 2020

Data to remind you that the @Chiefs mascot is racist af and encourages racism from their fans. https://t.co/3HPHSfjEJ5

— Ō’m”kaistaaw”kaa•kii (@mariahgladstone) February 2, 2020

https://twitter.com/stacyleeds/status/1224083963708432387

The suggestion was made that the “Arrowhead Chop” would damage the self esteem of “native youth.”

Studies show exposure to racist mascots damages the self esteem of Native youth. Our young people are dying by suicide higher than any other demographic in the US.

That’s why the @APA recommended..

Oh wait I forgot. @Chiefs, @Redskins and @nfl don’t give a shit. #SuperBowl

— Rebecca Nagle (@rebeccanagle) February 2, 2020

The Chiefs’ front office came under attack.

Racist AF

— Dave Zirin (@EdgeofSports) February 2, 2020

Just in case anyone thought that the racist "Tomahawk Chop" was a fan action, not sanctioned by the corporate owners of the @chiefs themselves: https://t.co/37WgCerPCL

— Jonah Blank (@JonahBlank) February 3, 2020

Chad came under attack as well.

https://twitter.com/maggie_wente/status/1224154107835043841

The Chiefs’ fandom is riddled with racism, apparently.

I just want to eat buffalo chicken dip without having to see Kansas City Chiefs fans being racist.

— ashley fairbanks (@ziibiing) February 2, 2020

Super Bowl feels; looking at the history of both team names: https://t.co/4m2tB2JJeE #SuperBowlLIV

— Sean Carleton (@SeanCarleton) February 2, 2020

So is now the right time to talk about how the @Chiefs as a sports team name is still racist as fuck? pic.twitter.com/6Gq4Wq9hse

— Christian (@YoImChristian) February 3, 2020

https://twitter.com/akayatuk/status/1223844351110873091

The outpouring of proverbial tears shed by leftist Twitter users over the Chiefs’ win may not be comparable to previous years where the New England Patriots took home the Lombardi trophy, but the resentment and hatred still burns long and hot.

Although the SJW cultural movement peaked around 2016/7, it’s time to take a look back at the strangest things that people deemed to be racist.

10. Spongebob Squarepants

Let’s begin with something recent. This past weekend, the amiable cartoon sea sponge was called ‘racist’ by a University of Washington professor due to living in the fictional ‘Bikini Bottom’–referring to the Bikini Atoll which was depopulated when it was taken over as a US Military nuclear testing site during the Cold War.

The author refers to America’s Imperialism as being the driving force to the deterritorialization of the native islanders who were–and are, to this day–deprived of their ancestral homeland.

9. Cold Weather

It’s been a while since The Root has drawn much public attention for its outlandish anti-white or anti-racist claims; often becoming the butt of many-a joke on social media from many non-SJW users. In 2017, The Root asked, “Is Cold Weather Racist?” According to the article:

“Yes, you read that correctly. Racist. Cold weather is racist. Cold weather racially profiles, segregates, gentrifies, colonizes, appropriates and is responsible for (at least) 90 percent of the unseasoned meats brought to company potlucks this month. It also possesses a changing agent that somehow makes black people even blacker.”

Seamlessly moving onto the next topic, number eight is linked to nine.

8. Winter Olympics

Articles from Slate and Sydney Morning Herald, written eight years apart, shed light on the absence of diversity at the Winter Olympics.

Of course, given the organic/geographical reasons behind a lack of diversity among the competitors, ‘racism’ is carted out as the universal symptom to any inequality.

7. Solar Eclipses

The 2017 solar eclipse which could been seen from the US was presented as racist by an Atlantic article and social media commentators.

The solar eclipse’s path was most prevalent in places less inhabited by black Americans–which is sufficient reason to slam as racist.

6. Air

The very air we breathe has been considered to be racist by many woke writers. Several publications have made the assertion that the reason behind why minorities breathe impurer air, on average, is because–you’ve guessed it–racism.

Of course, the real reason behind it is due to higher population densities of minority groups in inner city areas.

And inner city areas tend to have dirtier air than in the countryside. But no, it’s all a white supremacist conspiracy.

5. Dogs

Man’s best friend has been subject of much anti-racist rage. Multiple articles–even from psychology publications–place our four-legged friends under the microscope.

Dogs haven’t donned KKK gowns or any sharp uniforms designed by Hugo Boss; however, their propensity to bark at strangers among other behaviors is enough to categorize them as racist.

One such publication, Journey Dog Training, offers a guideline to make your dog into an ally:

Your dog probably doesn’t believe that one race is superior to another. Your dog probably doesn’t really feel discriminaion [sic] against a race, either. But your dog might show discrimination to a given race by:

Flinching

Hiding

Barking

Lunging

Growling

Other tension-related behaviors

4. Babies

Again, for this particular subject, plenty of articles have been published concerning this most alarming issue–baby racism. Even though they can’t walk or talk, they can still exhibit signs of racism.

However, your baby can be racist for looking at photos of people of their own race for longer than others.

Further, babies would pay more attention to those of their own race for longer than others. Case closed. Babies need to be cancelled for their vicious internalized racism.

3. Farmer’s Markets

Due to minorities failing to frequent farmers’ markets, per capita, at similar rates as white people; the logical conclusion is to zero in on racism.

Two professors from San Diego State University have made the claim that farmers’ markets in urban spaces reinforced white behavior–and that’s a problem because those areas become gentrified.

2. Obesity

According to Futurity, “A recent analysis found that frequent experiences of racism were associated with a higher risk of obesity among African-American women.”

There are, of course, various contributing factors towards obesity, but I’m not too sure Chick-fil-A and Papa John are colluding to single out WOC to send them to an early grave.

And *drumroll*

1. Being White

An Oklahoma high school teacher told his class, “To be white is to be racist, period.” Being born white is to be cursed with progressive Original Sin: racism.

So, there you have it, there’s little that can be done to cure terminal whiteness–except voluntarily forking over your disposable income to minority groups, confessing your internalized racism on a daily basis, and to champion minority causes while not speaking unless spoken to.