Florida Congressional Representative Daniel Webster appears to be wearing a Life Alert button around his neck in photographs, raising questions surrounding his fitness for office. Webster, one of America’s most absent lawmakers, cited medical obligations when he skipped the 2021 Trump impeachment vote and faces America First candidate Laura Loomer in the GOP Primary this Tuesday.

In a photograph of Rep. Webster gaining attention before Tuesday’s GOP Primary, when he will face Trump-aligned Laura Loomer in Florida’s 11th District, the elderly Representative who’s been in politics for over 40 years appears to be wearing a Life Alert button. The buttons, which come in the form of a necklace, are used for elderly or otherwise unwell individuals and can connect their owner to 911 with the push of a button.

Though multiple manufacturers produce the buttons, they’ve become colloquially referred to as “Life Alert,” given that brand’s iconic commercials depicting a senior citizen pressing the Life Alert button before shouting “Help! I’ve fallen and I can’t get up!”

While the Congressman’s supporters have dismissed claims that Webster is wearing a Life Alert button, those who say he is aren’t without merit.

Rep. Webster is the 7th most absent member of the 435-person House of Representatives and has missed some of the most critical votes in America’s history as a result. Last year, he missed a whopping 15% of Congressional votes and even sat out when Democrats led the uni-party establishment in voting to impeach 45th President Trump.

At the time, Rep. Webster claimed that he was out due to “family medical obligations.”

Shortly thereafter, Rep. Webster was absent from Congress yet again as uni-party legislators voted to form Nancy Pelosi’s January 6th “Witch Hunt” Commission. Though he never cast a vote on forming the Commission, Webster has gone on the record in claiming that Joe Biden is the legitimate winner of the 2020 Presidential Election, joining his fellow GOP career politicians in dismissing mountains of evidence of election fraud and irregularities.

As reflected by his top-ten absence ranking and adding credence to arguments that the Congressman may be unwell, missing those crucial votes was far from an anomaly for Webster. He was even absent when Democrats moved to federalize America’s elections and enfranchise illegal aliens.

His absences have been a key issue raised by America First candidate Laura Loomer, who is closely aligned with President Trump and has made a public spectacle of opposing tyranny at every turn, earning her lifetime bans from Big Tech platforms like Twitter. Voters in the district appear to have taken note of Webster’s absences as well, and it doesn’t bode well for his re-election prospects.

The 11th District is home to the famous Villages retirement community and, as a whole, boasts a higher-than-average population of senior citizens. Corporate media outlets have declared multiple times that Webster will be carried to victory on the backs of seniors, who they say will sympathize with his age and possible medical issues.

Those claims were massively rebuked in a recent Villages straw poll that saw Laura Loomer triumph over Webster in the retirement community.

Additionally, just ahead of Tuesday’s GOP Primary, Loomer is blowing out Webster when it comes to fundraising, besting him by a six-figure margin.

Read More: America First Candidate Laura Loomer Secures Massive Victory in Villages For Trump Straw Poll

National File contacted the office of Rep. Webster to ask whether or not he is wearing a Life Alert button and for further details regarding his frequent absences from Congress. After being forwarded to the Congressman’s campaign press team, National File has received no response from Webster or his staff.

Kevin McCarthy’s Congressional Leadership Fund is backing Steve Wells for Congress in New York’s 22nd District, the chosen successor of outgoing Trump impeachment voter Rep. John Katko. Opposite of Wells is Brandon Williams, the America First candidate endorsed by the district’s Conservative Party committees. Like in other races around the country, the GOP’s nominating contest has morphed into a battle between the McCarthy-aligned anti-Trump establishment and the grassroots MAGA movement.

In the closing days of the 22nd District’s GOP Primary race, the Kevin McCarthy-aligned Congressional Leadership Fund has dropped over $300,000 on pro-Wells advertisements, bringing the establishment PAC’s total investment in Steve Wells’ candidacy to a whopping $681,663. All in all, the Congressional Leadership Fund has spent more money on the race than Wells’ own campaign has, propping up a candidate that has outright refused to debate his opponent and appears to be in a deep rut ahead of voters going to the polls. 

With Rep. Katko, like other GOP impeachment voters, too unpopular to win re-election to Congress, he announced shortly following his 2021 impeachment vote that he’d be leaving Washington after the next election cycle.

“Great news, another one bites the dust,” President Trump said at the time.

Now, Katko’s former staff is running the Wells campaign in the newly-drawn 22nd District and National File has learned that just last month, Katko introduced Wells to a number of DC insiders and lobbyists.

Wells openly appears to have been positioned as Katko’s chosen successor and in addition to receiving the guidance of his former staff and networking with well-connected folks in Washington, Wells has donated more than $24,000 to Katko’s campaigns. What’s more, just after the outgoing Congressman voted with Democrats to impeach President Trump, Wells gave him a maximum donation.

According to campaign finance reports, when he wasn’t donating to Katko, Wells, who was formerly registered as a Democrat, donated $33,000 to disgraced ex-Governor Andrew Cuomo. Cuomo vowed to ban guns and presided over New York’s disastrous and deadly COVID-19 response. He’s also been among the left’s fiercest opponents of conservatism and the America First movement.

Despite his large donations to Katko and Cuomo, Wells has never donated to a Trump campaign or a Trump-aligned cause, helping to earn him the nickname “Liberal Steve Wells” on the campaign trail.

Wells previously ran for Congress in 2016, and, like in 2022, his candidacy consisted largely of launching negative ads toward his opponent, now-Rep. Claudia Tenney. Tenney accused him of pay-to-play politics with Democrat Governor Cuomo, citing his massive campaign contributions and the fact that Wells’ companies had been given lucrative state contracts by the failed Cuomo Administration.

Wells was trounced by Tenney at the polls after taking his campaign into nearly half a million dollars of debt that’s still outstanding. In a 2016 debate, Wells refused to say if he’d support then-candidate Trump if he won the GOP nomination and he was endorsed by retiring anti-Trump Rep. Richard Hanna. Hanna announced in 2016 that he wouldn’t vote for Trump if he were to become the GOP Presidential nominee against Hillary Clinton.

“I defeated Steve Wells in the 2016 Congressional Primary based mostly on his left-leaning political positions and his pay-to-play politics with then Governor Cuomo,” Tenney, who has been endorsed by President Trump in her midterm re-election bid, said in a recent social media post blasting Wells. “Wells learned with corrupt Halbritter and spent millions smearing me which set up difficult general election races for me in 2018 and 2020,” Tenney went on to write in the post, noting that Wells continued to donate to Cuomo even after the 2016 election.

In his 2022 race, Wells has failed to connect with the GOP’s conservative grassroots base, siding with pro-abortion leftists in declaring that life doesn’t begin at conception. He’s declined to take a strong stance on election integrity issues and has been endorsed by former GOP Rep. John Faso, who blasted President Trump for not “accepting” reported 2020 election results in contested states. In addition to his endorsement, Faso has donated to Wells’ campaign.

Wells has been repeatedly called out by his opponent, Navy Submarine Veteran Brandon Williams, over his refusal to debate, something the GOP base says is due to his fear of being exposed as a political fraud.

Noting the stark difference in the two candidate’s campaigns, local media reported that while Williams has embraced the America First MAGA movement, Wells has tried to “duck Trump talk.”

“My opponent is a former Democrat who gave $33,000 through his company to Andrew Cuomo, even after he was disgraced,” Brandon Williams said this week on Steve Bannon’s War Room. “He gave zero dollars to Donald Trump and he’s spent a million dollars on TV saying he’s the conservative Republican. Nobody believes him and our campaign is surging,” Williams said.

“My opponent refused to debate me,” Williams said. “I don’t know who does that.”

“Because you’re the MAGA candidate,” Bannon told Williams. “He doesn’t want to get up there and be destroyed by the MAGA.”

Tucker Carlson unveiled a trailer for his new documentary titled Patriot Purge a three-part series surrounding the “unanswered questions” about January 6.

Last night on Tucker Carlson Tonight, Fox News host Tucker Carlson revealed a trailer for his new January 6 documentary titled Patriot Purge, to be released via the Fox Nation streaming service in three parts.

The documentary details the U.S. government’s new “war on terror” that has justified using the events of the massive election theft protest held on January 6 that descended into chaos and limited violence during the certification of Joe Biden’s presidency. The trailer contains footage of Ashli Babbitt’s death, and shows black helicopters flying over the U.S. Capitol as experts weigh in on bombshell reports tying the events of January 6 to the federal government.

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1453517062073110540?s=20

“The U.S. government has in fact launched a new War on Terror, but it’s not against Al Qaeda, it’s against American citizens,” Carlson said. “This is an attack on core civil liberties.”

The trailer features commentary from Darren Beattie from Revolver News, who published a series of stories centered on the federal government’s covert involvement with the protest that day. “The Domestic War on Terror is here. It’s coming after… half of the country,” Beattie said in the trailer.

Ali Alexander, the founder of the Stop The Steal protest movement, who is a black man, also makes an appearance in the video. “I’ve been told that I’m a white nationalist.” he said while looking down at his hands. “Me!”

“False flags have happened in this country,” said Emily Grace at the end of the trailer. “One of which may have been January 6.”

During the Justice For J6 rally in Washington DC an armed masked man posing as a protestor was surrounded by Capitol Police and escorted out of the area upon the discovery that he was actually a federal law enforcement officer. Unlike many individuals jailed on seemingly harmless charges on January 6, the federal officer will not be facing charges for having a gun during the rally.

While some warned of a potential protest sabotage at the hands of undercover federal law enforcement ahead of the Justice For J6 rally in Washington, D.C. after multiple reports surfaced in recent months showcasing evidence of undercover federal involvement on January 6, but the September 18 event went largely without incident. However, in one bizarre instance that has been widely mocked online, a masked man was surrounded by riot gear-clad Capitol Police upon the discovery that he was carrying a firearm on his person, drawing concern from journalists, protesters, and those who were following the protest that day at home.

The entire mood changed when the masked man pulled out his badge – revealing himself to be an undercover federal law enforcement officer, vindicating the initial presumptions of countless Americans across the country. As National File reported, the man identified himself as undercover law enforcement, telling authorities The man replied “I’m just here” when asked if he was an undercover law enforcement when police found his firearm and gun. There is no confirmation that this man was on-duty law enforcement. Capitol Police extracted the masked man from the event without disarming or handcuffing him.

Americans have been consistently mocking the “pathetic” attempt by the government to infiltrate the event with undercover federal law enforcement over the days following the protest. “These guys would be great undercover at a golf course on Martha’s Vineyard,” tweeted Donald Trump Jr. after photos of what appears to be undercover federal law enforcement made waves online. (READ MORE: EXCLUSIVE: Paul Gosar Tells National File Whitmer Kidnapping Case Is ‘Proof In The Pudding’ Of Fed Infiltration On 1/6)

Fed 1: Definitely not a firearm in my pocket… I’m just happy to see you.

Fed 2: America is a top 10 maybe top 20 country… um, I mean America First… yea that’s it… America First!!!

These guys would be great undercover at a golf course on Martha’s Vineyard. https://t.co/4YEzaDix43

— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) September 18, 2021

Amid fallout from the armed undercover federal law enforcement officer’s incident with Capitol Police, the Associated Press is now reporting that the individual was supposedly working with “US Customs and Border Protection,” and will not face charges for bringing a firearm to the protest.

“A federal law enforcement officer was arrested carrying a gun at Saturday’s rally at the U.S. Capitol billed to support the suspects charged in January’s insurrection but will not be prosecuted.

The 27-year-old New Jersey man is an officer with U.S. Customs and Border Protection. He was arrested by Capitol Police for illegally possessing a gun on the grounds of the Capitol after people in the crowd reported seeing him with a handgun and notified nearby officers.”

The AP report also claims that his “arrest and presence at the event were surprising because the rally was billed as an event to support those who have been charged in January’s riot.”

The confirmed presence of federal law enforcement at the Justice For J6 rally in DC comes after National File confirmed the presence of undercover federal law enforcement embedded within the crowd at the January 6 Stop The Steal rally.

In the bombshell felony indictment made public this week, Special Prosecutor John Durham alleged that agents of the 2016 Clinton campaign knowingly concocted false allegations that President Donald Trump was receiving secret hi-tech communications from the Kremlin-linked Alfa Bank. The Durham indictment further alleged that Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann intentionally spread that hoax to the FBI, Democrat-friendly media and another undisclosed federal agency under false pretenses.

Moreover, the Durham indictment identifies the mastermind of the operation to create spread and spread the Alfa Bank Hoax as a Big Tech executive, who allegedly “exploited” privately-held data of several large tech companies to create a false “narrative” about Trump-Russia collusion. This person may be Eric Schmidt, the former Executive Chairman of Alphabet, the parent company of Google.

The conspiracy theory that Donald J. Trump’s 2016 campaign was secretly communicating with Russia-based Alfa Bank through a secret server has been an obsession of Anti-Trump circles for years, despite being debunked by both the FBI and the Mueller Investigation. Proponents still insist that, despite being repeatedly found baseless, federal authorities have simply failed to muster the technical expertise to expose the dastardly Russian plot.

However, according to the Durham indictment, the team which initially drafted the white paper outlining the conspiracy theory knew full well that it was nonsense – but disseminated it anyway to craft a “narrative” to trigger a federal investigation and publicly undermine President Trump.

Shortly after the felony indictment for making false statements to the FBI went public, Sussmann’s law firm – Perkins Coie – issued this statement: “In light of the Special Counsel’s action today, Michael Sussmann, who has been on leave from the firm, offered his resignation from the firm in order to focus on his legal defense, and the firm accepted it.”

Perkins Coie represented both the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee in 2016. The firm served a vital role in the fabrication and dissemination of the debunked Steele Dossier – a document which alleged, among other things, that Trump had urinated on Russian prostitutes in a hotel room the where the Obama family stayed.

More recently, Perkins Coie represented Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) in a failed lawsuit against National File, which claimed that Kelly had not dressed as Adolf Hitler and a Perkins Coie attorney argued in front of a judge to stop the upcoming Arizona Election Audit. (READ MORE: Mark Kelly Drops Lawsuit Claiming He Didn’t Dress As Hitler, National File Report Stands)

The white paper was allegedly the brainchild of one Clinton campaign confidant, who the Durham indictment refers to as Tech Executive-1, who “claimed to have been previously offered a position in government in the event Hillary Clinton won the Presidency” and “exploited his access to non-public data at multiple Internet companies to conduct opposition research concerning Trump … By virtue of his position at Internet Company-1 and other companies, Tech Executive-1 maintained direct or indirect access to, and the ability to provide others access to, large amounts of internet and cybersecurity data, including DNS data,” emphasis added by National File.

The Durham indictment refers to three tech companies which Tech Executive-1 leveraged influence over on behalf of the Clinton campaign:

Internet Company-1 “offers various Internet-related services and products, including Domain Name System (“DNS”) resolution services”; Internet Company-2 “among other things, collected DNS data from various points on the internet”; and Internet Company-3 “received data that had been collected by Internet Company-2 or its parent company, and then used and analyzed that data in order to advise its private sector customers on cybersecurity and business risks.”

It is unclear who the executive is, but Eric Schmidt seems to fit the description. At the time, he was Executive Chairman of Alphabet Inc, the parent company of Google, and an unofficial advisor to the Clinton campaign, who founded start-up The Groundwork to serve as a top-tier tech contractor for the campaign.

Alphabet is the parent company of Google, which owns the largest public DNS service in the world. Alphabet also had an ownership stake in Crowdstrike, which provided cybersecurity services to the DNC and took a leading role in investigating alleged Russian cyber-attacks against the DNC as well as the Clinton campaign.

Emails from 2014 published by Wikileaks revealed that John Podesta, chairman of the Clinton campaign, believed that Schmidt “clearly wants to be head outside advisor”.

Google/Alphabet Chairman Eric Schmidt ready "fund, advise, recruit" for Clinton campaign https://t.co/vy3lHcft3n & https://t.co/sdK9j0dUnR pic.twitter.com/FUlYqsitmJ

— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) November 1, 2016

National File spoke to Google whistleblower Zach Vorhies to scrutinize the document. “I strongly suspect that ‘Internet Company-1’ mentioned in the Durham indictment is Alphabet, ‘Internet Company-2’ is Google, and ‘Tech Executive-1’ is Eric Schmidt,” said Vorhies. “That would certainly fit the facts of the indictment, but I could be wrong. And, since we are speculating, could ‘Internet Company-3’ be CrowdStrike?”

Vorhies shot to prominence when, as a Google employee, he collected and released 950 pages of documents he says prove Google’s use of an “AI-Censorship” system called “Machine Learning Fairness” that merges Critical Race Theory and artificial intelligence to shape the views of Google users on its various platforms, including YouTube and its eponymous search engine. Vorhies followed up this conversation by speaking out on Twitter:

It’s beginning to look like Google meddled in the 2016 election by whoring out privileged access to its user's private data, in order to fabricate evidence against Trump to support Clinton’s Russian-collusion hoax.https://t.co/IONzpqscUV

— Zach Vorhies / Google Whistleblower (@Perpetualmaniac) September 17, 2021

Another key allegation, and the foundation of the Durham indictment’s sole criminal charge, is that Sussmann lied to then-FBI General Counsel James Baker by claiming not to have been disseminating this information on behalf of any client – but he was billing the Clinton campaign for time spent drafting the white paper, speaking with Tech Executive 1 and pitching the story to reporters.

Sussmann even billed his meeting with Baker to the Clinton campaign, along with the description, “work and communications regarding confidential project.”

Baker later claimed in sworn congressional testimony to not remember whether Sussmann had identified a client he was working for. Sussmann also denied this under oath to Congress in 2017, claiming to have been working on behalf of an unnamed cybersecurity expert. This may have been technically true in 2017 because, after the end of the Clinton campaign in 2016, Sussmann started billing hours worked on the disinformation project to Tech Executive-1.

Sussmann’s testimony took place on December 18th, 2017. Just four days later, Eric Schmidt resigned from his position as the executive chairman of Alphabet Inc. and, to date, nobody has given a detailed explanation why.

Regardless, the Durham indictment features an apparent smoking gun: a contemporaneous note taken by Bill Priestap, who was the assistant director of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division. Priestap’s notes explain that Sussmann explicitly said that he was not doing this on behalf of the Clinton campaign, the DNC or any other of his firm’s clients.

The notes further say that Sussmann identified the source of the Alfa Bank hoax as three concerned citizens in the tech sector – which was an apparent lie, as none of them seem to have had anything to do with the research or drafting of the white paper. According to Durham, the actual authors of the paper were Tech Executive-1, the originator of the hoax, two computer researchers and Sussmann himself.

The Durham indictment alleges that Tech Executive-1 assembled a massive tranche of private data from the technology companies he had influence over, then tasked researchers at a U.S. university to mine it for dirt on Trump. Tech Executive-1 also apparently leveraged his corporate authority to help the same U.S. university with a federal government contract.

Unfortunately for Tech Executive-1, the two researchers came up with nothing to substantiate the original Alfa Bank conspiracy theory and generally agreed that the specific allegations were probably nonsense – specifically, a “red herring” that should be “ignored”.

So the researchers, as the Durham indictment details, suggested by email that they could just fake the documentation to validate the Alfa Bank hoax.

On the same day, “Tech Executive-1 clarified in an email to [them] that the ‘task’ he had given them was ‘indeed broad'”, going on further to seemingly suggest that “the VIPS would be happy” for any evidence – even fake evidence – that would justify “closer examination” of an otherwise “true story”.

After the white paper was drafted, an email from Tech Executive-1 asked the team to review it critically from the lens of a “security expert (NOT a dns expert)”, specifying that the paper did not have to pass muster to an expert in the relevant field – let alone be accurate in the first place – but simply be believable to a cybersecurity expert who didn’t have enough time to actually invest effort into researching DNS security and discovering the glaring flaws in their argument.

The respondents agreed that the white paper did a great job of falsely establishing itself as authoritative:

“A DNS expert would poke several holes to [sic] this hypothesis (primarily around visibility, about which very smartly you do not talk about). That being said, I do not think even the top security (non-DNS) researchers can refute your statements. Nice!” (Emphasis in original.)

Coverage of the Durham indictment has been scant, but a few savvy commentators on the political Right, such as law professor and Epoch Times commentator Hans Mahncke, have flagged it as a bombshell.

The Sussmann indictment is dynamite: The TLDR is that a lawyer acting on behalf of Hillary Clinton used fabricated evidence to get the FBI to investigate Trump.

No wonder the NYT was scrambling last night to spin this as being about a billing mistake.https://t.co/a8M7KGUHXM

— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) September 16, 2021

In an exclusive interview with National File, the constitutional lawyer and former Green Beret commander Ivan Raiklin – mostly known for his plan from December to contest the 2020 election for Trump – spoke to National File about the severity of Durham’s indictment.

“Anything from John Durham needs to be looked at in the context of his relationships with current and former members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, particularly Mike Pence and Lindsey Graham – alongside his relationships with current and former officials in the FBI and DOJ: particularly Comey, Rosenstein, McCabe, Peter Strock, Joe Pientka, and Andrew Weissman,” said Raiklin. “His prosecution path like a ‘sacrificial lamb’ situation like with [former FBI attorney] Kevin Clinesmith where [Sussmann] is just going to get a slap on the wrist to satisfy conservatives who rightly feel betrayed.” Raiklin added:

This could be a prelude to getting [Sussmann] into a plea to cooperate against the others, but I’m not holding my breath.

At the very least, this opens up the Department of Justice and everyone named in this indictment to a lawsuit from anyone indicted as a result of Crossfire Hurricane (the federal spying on the Trump Campaign), including: Donald J. Trump, Roger Stone, Michael Cohen, Carter Page, General Flynn and others.

The real question I’m asking is “Why isn’t he being charged with conspiracy?” That’s what this indictment reads like. Maybe there are other conspirators who could be charged in the future and it’s worth keeping in mind that the statute of limitations for conspiracy doesn’t begin until the conspiracy is over.

National File is continuing to discuss the revelations with tech experts and top lawyers. We will continue our reporting as the story develops.

The day after January 6, Trey Gowdy went on Fox News to condemn President Trump and his supporters for the events that took place at the US Capitol, stating, “Prosecute every damn one of them to the fullest extent of the law.”

Americans may have forgotten that Trey Gowdy, host of Sunday Night in America on Fox News, previously slammed President Donald Trump and his supporters over the events that took place at the Capitol on January 6, calling for the government to “prosecute every damn one of them to the fullest extent of the law” the day after the situation took place.

“Just a sad despicable day. I never, never thought, I worked there for 8 years Sandra, I never thought I would see Americans assault law enforcement officers trying to break into the People’s House. Prosecute every one of them to the fullest extent of the law,” Gowdy told Fox News host Sandra Smith, as the FBI call line showed on the screen. (READ MORE: CONFIRMED: Feds Were Embedded In 1/6 Crowd Alongside Militia Members)

“I don’t know how reasonably foreseeable it should be for cops that tens of thousands of people are going to be told to go fight, that an election was stolen from them, to go fight, to blame Mike Pence and Tommy Cotton and Ken Buck and other Republicans,” Gowdy said.

“Did you listen to the President’s speech yesterday?” Gowdy asked Smith. “I did,” she replied. Gowdy continued, “Who said go fight? Who blamed Mike Pence? Who blamed Republicans? Who said the election was stolen?” (READ MORE: Pence Eyes 2024 Presidential Run After Betraying Constitution, Trump, American People)

“I can tell you that [President Trump] said ‘Let’s march together to the Capitol.’ I don’t think he marched with them so, I don’t blame the cops when tens of thousands of people are told an election was stolen from them, and then they decide to scale the walls of the People’s House. I don’t blame the cops for that. I blame the people who did it,” said Gowdy.

Robert Maurice Reeder, a registered Democrat who was arrested for being inside the US Capitol and attacking police on January 6, is now pleading to the court for a lighter sentence because he was posing as a Trump supporter during the time of his alleged crimes.

The narrative of January 6 being pushed by Democrats and establishment politicians continues to collapse. A new report by The Gateway Pundit says a man named Robert Maurice Reeder, who was arrested for storming the Capitol and attacking police. Reeder is now pleading with the court to receive a lighter sentence due to the revelation that he was not actually a real Trump supporter, but in fact, a registered Democrat posing as an election integrity protestor whose goal that day was to make the real protestors look bad.

He was watching television coverage of a pro-Trump crowd which had gathered for a speeches on the Ellipse, when he made a spur-of-the-moment decision to hop a train into Washington, D.C., to join the event. After listening to the oratory on the Ellipse, he says he visited various area monuments before arriving at the U.S. Capitol and joining the “initially festive” events which by then were transpiring… He pleaded guilty to one of those counts — count four — and was due to be sentenced Wednesday.

According to the report, Reeder was set to receive his lighter sentence for posing as a MAGA protestor until a video showed him violently attacking police officers. On January 6, Reeder exhibited inflammatory and violent behavior to paint the surrounding Trump supporters as violent and unhinged. “Reeder was a typical Biden agitator who wanted to interrupt the Republican objections inside the Capitol. And he wanted to frame Trump supporters as violent insurrectionists,” reported Gateway Pundit.

In new January 6 footage, a man dressed in tactical gear and a gas mask can be seen aiming a rifle at the crowd. The new angle was filmed by Jason Funes, who recently released the footage via his YouTube channel. It is unknown whether the supposed officer was a member the Capitol Police or another law enforcement agency, as National File reported.

The new video was filmed just outside one of the main entrances to the Capitol building. A group of 5-10 individuals can be seen pounding on the door with bats, some equipped with riot shields. Almost all of these individuals were wearing helmets and other tactical gear. The rest of the crowd can be seen standing idly by, simply protesting.

Around the 1:58 mark in the new angle, a man can be seen pointing a rifle at the crowd. The presumed police officer was dressed in full tactical gear and was wearing a gas mask. He can be seen outside the building aiming his rifle at the crowd for about 8 seconds before retreating back inside. It is unknown whether the gun was armed with live ammunition or rubber bullets, though rubber bullet guns tend to have wide barrels.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell yesterday promised to shield Joe Biden from a push for impeachment, telling reporters that the wildly unpopular Biden regime is here to stay despite a disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal that saw 13 American soldiers killed and the Taliban armed with billions of dollars in United States military equipment.

“Well, look, the president is not going to be removed from office,” said McConnell, who was asked if he would support a push for impeachment over the Afghanistan withdrawal. “There isn’t going to be an impeachment,” he added. McConnell then suggested Biden’s performance would result in establishment Republicans making big gains in the 2022 midterm elections, and described the soaring unpopularity of Biden as “buyer’s remorse.”

Despite being friendly with Democrats by advancing Joe Biden’s infrastructure bill that would see drivers taxed per mile, supporting anti-gun, pro-Antifa Attorney General Merrick Garland when he was appointed by Biden. and publicly accusing President Donald Trump of inciting violence on January 6 and suggesting a criminal investigation – even though he voted to acquit him – McConnell has gained few friends on the left.

As National File previously reported, some on the left believe McConnell stole his 2020 Senate reelection using the same type of fraud that many say resulted in Joe Biden winning the presidential election. McConnell also remains a bogeyman to leftists on Twitter, who blame him for the Supreme Court refusing to stop a Texas law that bans abortions after six weeks.

At the same time, McConnell has soured his relationship with the Republican base. As President Trump highlighted earlier this year, McConnell has extensive family ties to China that enriched him heavily. His wife, Elaine Chao, is the daughter of shipping magnets James and Ruth Chao, and the sister of businesswoman Angela Chao, who was appointed to a position on the Bank of China’s board of directors in 2016. He inherited $30 million after the death of Ruth, who owned a shipping titan that, while nominally based in the United States, worked almost exclusively with China and never flew the United States flag while sailing.

Following a lengthy public feud with President Donald Trump that began in the days following the 2020 election, with McConnell at one point allegedly blackmailing the 45th President, using the threat of impeachment to influence his pardons, McConnell was not invited to CPAC in 2021. President Trump has bashed McConnell repeatedly, blaming him for the narrow loss of the Senate in 2021, and referring to him as a “dour, sullen, and unsmiling political hack” who does not deserve the respect he receives in Washington, D.C. McConnell became so unpopular after betraying President Trump that one county in Kentucky demanded his resignation.

At one point this year, the relationship became so sour that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) went to Florida to visit with President Trump and urge him to end his feud with the establishment Republican leader. Graham is widely seen as McConnell’s logical replacement by the establishment, and McConnell is reportedly working on an exit strategy with the Kentucky Republican Party that would allow him to retire before the end of his term.

President Donald Trump issued another statement criticizing former Attorney General Bill Barr and Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) for not fighting for the Presidency and getting the election “sealed for Biden” despite evidence of voter fraud during the 2020 election.

President Trump doubled down on his criticisms of Senator Mitch McConnell and former Attorney General Bill Barr in a new statement. “Had Mitch McConnell fought for the Presidency like he should have, there would right now be Presidential Vetoes on all of the phased Legislation that he has proven to be incapable of stopping,” wrote President Trump.

President Trump slammed McConnell for losing two Senate seats in Georgia and causing Republicans to lose their Senate majority. “Not to mention, he lost two Senatorial seats in Georgia, making the Republicans the Minority in the Senate. He never fought for the White House and blew it for the Country,” President Trump said.

The former President expressed his regret for supporting McConnell during his reelection in Kentucky, which some have argued was stolen. “Too bad I backed him in Kentucky, he would have been primaried and lost!” said President Trump.

READ MORE: Democrat Reporter Makes Case That Mitch McConnell Stole 2020 Victory With Corrupt Voting Machines

President Trump slammed McConnell for convincing “his buddy,” former Attorney General Bill Barr, “to get the corrupt (based on massive amounts of evidence that the Fake News refuses to mention!) election done, over with, and sealed for Biden, ASAP!”

The news comes the day after President Trump issued a previous statement slamming Barr, McConnell, and “spineless RINO’s” for “facilitating the cover up of  Crime of the Century, the Rigged 2020 Presidential Election” in a statement in which he detailed evidence of election fraud, as National File reported. 

In the statement, President Trump said former Attorney General Bill Barr “failed to investigate election fraud, and really let down the American people,” citing the “scam in took place in Georgia” where Ruby Freeman, Shaye Moss and their accomplices were captured on camera counting what appeared to be thousands of ballots after observers were told to leave. “He couldn’t see what was wrong with it,” continued President Trump. “Just like he failed to understand the Horowitz report and let everyone down with respect to getting a timely investigation (where’s Durham?) on all of the corruption of the Obama-Biden administration.”

Speaking at the Faith and Freedom Coalition Summit, disgraced former Vice President Mike Pence was greeted with boos and chants of “traitor!” by protestors in the crowd.

As National File previously reported, “A video posted to Twitter with the caption “Pence gets drowned out by hecklers at the Faith & Freedom Coalition summit, some of whom appear to be chanting ‘traitor!’” shows that shortly after Pence said “It is great to be back with so many patriots,” he was swamped with a chorus of boos.”

National File has obtained additional footage of the scene provided on Telegram by Constitutional lawyer Ivan Raiklin, giving viewers a separate angle from the protestors viewpoint. In the video posted to Gab TV, viewers can clearly hear what the protestors are shouting as they are escorted out of the venue by security. The protestors repeatedly shout “Traitor!” at the former Vice President before being escorted out by security.

While delivering remarks at the Reagan Presidential Library in California, former Vice President Mike Pence said he would “always be proud” that he certified the fraudulent electoral college votes of Joe Biden on January 6, a move that legal experts say was an outright betrayal of President Donald Trump, the Constitution of the United States, and the American people, as National File reported.

“Pence is now attempting to ignore his egregious December 23, 2020 Constitutional Violations and Jan 6 decisions to deflect his likely conspiracy with Pelosi and McConnell to go after anyone that supported Trump. It almost appears as though a deal was made to erase Trump supporters collectively between the establishment leaders of both parties,” said Raiklin.

On Pence being booed, National File originally reported:

Congressional candidate Jarome Bell broke the news on Twitter, stating “@Mike_Pence was just BOOed at the Faith and Freedom Coalition summit. There’s a group of people yelling “TRAITOR” at him. They’re not wrong. They have been led to the exits. Pence should have done more to fight disputed electors.”

A video posted to Twitter with the caption “Pence gets drowned out by hecklers at the Faith & Freedom Coalition summit, some of whom appear to be chanting ‘traitor!’” shows that shortly after Pence said “It is great to be back with so many patriots,” he was swamped with a chorus of boos.

https://twitter.com/AndrewSolender/status/1405928997880533003