Frasier star Kelsey Grammer supports President Donald Trump in the 2024 election, and the Paramount studio reportedly does not want Grammer talking too much about it.

“I am. And I’ll let that be the end of it,” Kelsey Grammer said, when asked by a BBC interviewer named Justin Webb if he is continuing to support President Trump. It was Paramount that evidently decided that Grammer’s Trump support should not be delved into.

BBC interviewer Justin Webb elaborated, “I have to say, actually, Kelsey Grammer himself was perfectly happy to go on talking about it. The Paramount+ PR people, less happy that he talked about it at some length so we… They decided that we’d had plenty of time for our interview. But I should stress that he was absolutely perfectly happy to talk about why he supports Donald Trump and still does in the coming election.”

Interesting. Why won’t Hollywood let a living legend like Kelsey Grammer talk? Grammer has been playing Dr. Frasier Crane since the 1980’s on Cheers, and then through the celebrated run of Frasier on NBC. Grammer is also the voice of “Sideshow Bob” on The Simpsons, and an all-around living legend.

Kelsey Grammer is producing and starring in the Paramount Plus Frasier reboot, in which his Frasier Crane character reconnects with his economically less-fortunate son, a generational premise that may resonate with many families as the future of the American economy looks bleak. Nevertheless, Grammer’s charm and gravitas bode well for the optimistic reboot.

US Navy and Pentagon brass have admitted to using a “non-binary” drag queen as a social media recruiting ambassador, in an effort to lure in new recruits amidst a historically bad enlistment downturn. As part of the recruiting campaign, the drag queen told prospective recruits in an Instagram video that the US Navy had facilitated his drag performances for fellow sailors while on deployment.

US Navy Yeoman 2nd Class Joshua Kelley, who’s known as “Harpy Daniels” when he dresses like a caricature of a woman, became the Navy’s first “digital ambassador” in November of 2022. He served in the role for six months, until the digital ambassador program was discontinued, perhaps temporarily, after the Pentagon’s homosexuality and “diversity” initiatives began facing serious criticism from members of Congress.

“The Navy has invited me to be the first Navy digital ambassador,” Joshua Kelley, the “non-binary” drag queen sailor wrote in an Instagram video post, dated November 16, 2022, announcing his new position, which the Navy says he wasn’t paid any extra money for.

The video featured Kelley in multiple iterations of “Harpy Daniels,” his drag queen persona, as well as claims that homosexuals are being “oppressed” in the United States.

“I identify as Non-Binary and this has been an unbelievable experience since I’ve joined the Navy,” a caption that accompanied the post read before Kelley added that since joining the Navy in 2016, he’s been able to “share” his “drag experience” with “fellow sailors,” including during deployments when the Navy apparently facilitated drag shows on its ships.

“This experience has brought me so much strength, courage and ambition to continue being an advocate and representation of queer sailors!” the error-ridden caption continued.

“Thank you to the Navy for giving me this opportunity! I don’t speak for the Navy but simply sharing my experience in the Navy! Hooyah, and let’s go Slay!”

Reportedly, the Navy has discontinued the “digital ambassador” program that platformed Kelley and his drag persona, perhaps temporarily as the Navy “evaluates” its worth.

“The Navy did not compensate YN2 Kelley or any others for being Navy digital ambassadors,” a Navy spokesperson says. “We are now evaluating the program and how it will exist in the future.”

The Navy isn’t the only branch of the US military that’s promoting drag queens and homosexuality on the taxpayer’s dime.

As exclusively reported by National File, the US Air Force planned to host a “drag queen story time” event for children on Ramstein Air Force base in Germany. However, after National File exposed the demented plans, the event was canceled.

“Really sick stuff,” a source told NATIONAL FILE…“My tax dollars are being used by the MILITARY to sexualize children.”

National File EXCLUSIVE: U.S. Air Force Base Hosts Drag Queen Story Time

Similarly, since 2016, left-wing forces within America’s government and military have sought to heavily promote the transgender movement within the service. Not only are self-proclaimed transgenders being permitted to serve openly in the military, but American taxpayers are being forced to foot the bill for their castration and mutilation procedures.

A new Disney show marketed to small children promotes transgenderism, the idea that men can have periods and profiles homosexual relationships among animated, young boy characters.

The new “Baymax” children’s series was released on June 28th and is a spin-off of Disney’s “Big Hero 6,” following an inflatable “doctor-bot” named Baymax as he patrols his “San Fransokyo” neighborhood offering free healthcare and emotional support to his neighbors.

Thus far, the series consists of six, roughly nine-minute mini-episodes and is being directed to kids as young as 2-years-old while featuring several suggestive and subversive themes. In one video clip of the show making its rounds over the internet, the Baymax robot enters the tampon aisle of his local grocery store and starts asking a woman for advice on which feminine hygiene product is best.

“Excuse me, which of these products would you recommend?” Baymax asks the female customer before receiving a number of comments from other women, and even men, about the efficacy of certain tampons and pads.

In the process, a character appearing to be a teenage boy turns around, before it is realized that the “boy” is in fact a female, presenting as a male and wearing a transgender flag across her t-shirt while shopping for feminine hygiene products.

“I always get the ones with wings,” announces the trans character in a gravely masculine voice – something parents and cultural observers are blasting online as a deliberate, in-your-face attempt to confuse children, and indoctrinate them with far-left gender-bender values.

Disney's upcoming Big hero 6 spinoff series “Baymax,” discusses topics such a women’s menstrual cycle. pic.twitter.com/p9j5FAIvLl

— Joshua (@Joshuajered) June 29, 2022

While the trans tampon scene has gotten the most attention online, it is far from the only chapter of Baymax that is causing concern among parents as the show is rolled out. In addition to including several scenes that could almost be described as an animated, televised version of “Social Emotional Learning,” where Baymax offers psychological assistance to his friends and neighbors, the show profiles the homosexual relationships of animated children and even describes their hormonal responses to apparent sexual tension.

https://twitter.com/lucaspaguro/status/1542160139180032001?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1542160139180032001%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fdisney-full-throttle-on-woke-lgbt-agenda-transgender-baymax

In addition to the latest dust-up over “Baymax,” Disney has made headlines on a regular basis as of late for their open sexualization and indoctrination of children, which often includes the promotion of homosexuality and transgenderism.

In the new children’s film “Lightyear!,” a homosexual relationship between two female characters is a central theme of the movie and culminates in a scene where the two are shown kissing as they raise a child together. While the content originally didn’t make the cut to be included in the movie, it was added back in after Disney employees became enraged by Florida legislation protecting kids at school from sexualization.

RELATED: Four Disney Employees Were Arrested in a Florida Human Trafficking Sting 

A recent column published by MSNBC accused physically fit men of being fascists. The article specifically focused on those involved in weightlifting and mixed martial arts training, accusing them of practicing “fascist fitness.”

MSNBC’s “fascist fitness” column was written by far-left academic Cynthia Miller-Idriss, a professor and researcher on extremism at American University. Miller-Idriss used the column to compare men who are into physical fitness and mixed martial arts to Adolf Hitler and the Nazis while expressing worry that those who are strong physically and possess a masculine self-image will reject the teachings of the left. She even claims that they may eventually be responsible for violence in the streets and that governments and other organizations need to plan on cracking down.

Miller-Idriss expressed great concern with at-home fitness routines popularized during COVID lockdowns, claiming that “the far-right has taken advantage of pandemic at-home fitness trends to expand its decade-plus radicalization of physical mixed martial arts (MMA) and combat sports spaces.”

Appearing unhappy that people remained able to communicate during COVID lockdowns, Miller-Idriss claimed that “fascist fitness” groups on Telegram took advantage of the downtime, luring young men in with promises of bulging biceps before ultimately inviting them to “closed chat groups where far-right content is shared.”

Even more alarming to Miller-Idriss than young men spending time at the gym, or with a set of dumbbells at home, is the idea of mixed martial arts training, which says she remembers reading about in Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Miller-Idriss says that those interested in MMA are training for the “coming race war” and warned that if young men join MMA gyms, they may be able to share their political thoughts with other physically strong young men, leading to more of what she claims to be right-wing radicalization.

Even worse, says Miller-Idriss, is that the practice of MMA resembles hand-to-hand combat and when combined with other forms of physical fitness and thoughts that she doesn’t approve of, it could make for “a dangerous and powerful cocktail of radicalization.”

Masculinity, specifically the masculinity of white men, has come under constant attack in recent years, and the left has become obsessed with sports like MMA and weightlifting, which fall outside of the purview of their traditional media and entertainment dominance. Unlike in the NFL, where far-left corporate sponsors have pushed the league towards the feminine left, leagues like mixed martial arts’ UFC and bodybuilding’s IFBB have remained pro-man, pro-fitness, and pro-America and several big names in the sports have taken public stances against the left.

Scientific studies have shown time and time again that men in poor physical condition with low levels of testosterone are more likely to support left-wing political and cultural movements.

New polling data shows that fans of DC’s NFL football team despise the new Washington Commanders moniker taken up by the club after they “retired” their former name of Washington Redskins, caving to pressure from the radical left.

According to a recently released poll that was conducted earlier this month, a 49% plurality of local fans surveyed expressed their disapproval of the new Washington Commanders name, which took the organization nearly two years to develop and unveil only to receive a flat reception. While 11% of those surveyed expressed no opinion on the matter, just 41% said they approve of their team being known as the Washington Commanders.

When the same data is expanded on, it gets even worse for the football team who changed their name against the will of their fans and players, with a whopping 17% of fans saying they “hate” the new Commanders moniker. Meanwhile, only 5% of them say that they “love” it.

The club’s historic fan base has included DC city residents and suburbanites in Maryland and Northern Virginia, but also stretches south to engulf the rest of Virginia and large portions of the Carolinas, where despite the presence of the Panthers since the mid-1990s, legions of fans of the burgundy and gold maintain affection for Washington football.

Throughout the name-change process, Washington’s owner, Dan Snyder, who in the past vowed that he would never change the name of the Redskins no matter what the cost, was criticized for folding to far-left pressure and going back on his promises. Snyder was also blasted for not consulting with his own team’s fans over the change, keeping the process largely under wraps and after a multi-year name-changing process, presenting a stale moniker devoid of any cultural or regional value.

Even worse, the Commanders’ nickname, and many of their marketing gimmicks including their #TakeCommand social media hashtag, appear to be ripped right from the San Antonio Commanders of the short-lived Alliance of American Football.

The team has also been mocked over their corporate-looking uniforms – which fans have compared to those of an arena league team – and lack of an actual mascot or logo. Players’ helmets will feature the letter “W”, much as they have in recent years while playing as the “Washington Football Team,” and in absence of an actual team logo, the franchise has revealed a “Team Crest” for fans to wear on hats and t-shirts.

Many fans say they’ll continue to sport Washington Redskins gear indefinitely, and never buy into the new politically correct nickname or merchandise.

The future of Washington football is here #TakeCommand pic.twitter.com/MwkCLTkVAA

— Washington Commanders (@Commanders) February 2, 2022