Republican vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance doubled down on his totally accurate comments about how America should not be ruled by childless cat ladies who wish to inflict suffering on others to compensate for their own emotional emptiness.

“We are effectively run in this country via the Democrats, via our corporate oligarchs, by a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made, so they want to make of the country miserable too,” Vance said in a 2021 Tucker Carlson interview.

Vance pinpointed a big problem in society that most young people and certainly all service workers have faced: the hostility of angry self-righteous liberal women who look and sound like Rachel Maddow. Notably, the “Karen” phenomenon has become a big part of American culture, referring to women who complain all the time and try to call the cops and get people in trouble for no reason. There is obviously a lot of overlap between Karens and cat ladies.

The Left went nuts (as usual) over the remarks, and fading ex-starlet Jennifer Aniston decided to weigh in on behalf of the cat lady demographic.

“I’ve heard from a lot of conservative women, and frankly, a lot of liberal women who said, ‘I’m actually glad that you pointed out there’s become something profoundly anti-family in our public policy in our republic conversation.’ Obviously, it was a sarcastic comment,” Vance said in a recent follow-up interview with Megyn Kelly.

“I’ve got nothing against cats, I’ve got nothing against dogs, I’ve got one dog at home and I love him. But look, people are focusing so much on the sarcasm and not on the substance of what I actually said. And the substance of what I said, I’m sorry, It’s true. It is true that we become anti-family. It is true that the left has become anti-child. It is simply true that it’s become way too hard to raise a family. I myself had a lot of step-parents when I was growing up. I certainly was enriched by some of those step-parents and frankly not enriched by others,” Vance stated.

NATIONAL FILE will continue to expose the Karens and the cat ladies among us, pinpointing the source of their undue power in our political affairs.

Pennsylvania Democrat governor Josh Shapiro, who is now in the running to be Kamala Harris’ vice presidential candidate, stands accused of covering up election fraud complaints against Democrats dating back years during his tenure as attorney general, leading a whistleblower to accuse Shapiro of being “criminally negligent.”

“AG Shapiro turned a blind eye to the alleged criminal wrongdoing of members of the Democrat Party in our county (Fayette County, Pennsylvania). These same Democrats now owe gubernatorial candidate Shapiro their support in his run for the governorship.  They hosted him recently,” whistleblower Robert Frasconi told NATIONAL FILE, noting that he made a formal 2018 complaint directly to Shapiro “after the numerous contacts to his subordinates went unanswered.”

Robert Frasconi told NATIONAL FILE: “1.  A case of alleged election fraud involving a former Democrat state representative who served 10 years as state representative in the 51st Legislative District.  Timothy S. Mahoney was elected alongside Josh Shapiro after the middle-of-the-night pay raise scandal of July 2005.  Shapiro and Mahoney served together on the House Reform Committee.  They are friends.  Mahoney pushed for a countywide referendum on school consolidation in 2011.  Pennsylvania law does not permit advisory referenda.  Thus, I and my colleague, Delinda Young, challenged Mahoney’s referendum petition in the local PA Court of Common Pleas.  We prevailed, and Mahoney’s referendum petition was struck.  We later came to learn of Mahoney’s election fraud — he altered and falsified affidavits of circulator and signed as the sole affiant, as if he solely circulated the petitions.  He also perjured himself in the courtroom as he lied about the circulation period for his referendum petitions.  Mahoney receives credit for pushing for the PA’s so-called Open Records law.  Interestingly, we made open records requests for Mahoney’s per diem records during his purported circulation period of his referendum petitions June 1 – Aug. 8, 2011.  As Mahoney then sat on the House Appropriations Committee, and as the PA budget must by law be completed by July 1, the per diem records showed that Mahoney was reimbursed for overnight stays in Harrisburg (200-plus miles away from Fayette County).  Thus, Mahoney could not be in Harrisburg and before 50 continuously circulating referendum petitions as he attested on his altered and falsified affidavits of circulator.  In short, the proof of Mahoney’s election fraud is incontrovertible and irrefutable.  My colleague, Delinda Young, and I went through two election boards, two district attorneys, and three AGs (including Josh Shapiro) to no avail as they all covered for Mahoney.”

Robert Frasconi stated: “2.  In 2012, Fayette County DA Jack R. Heneks, Jr. made an application to impanel a county investigating grand jury. Primarily, the Grand Jury was impanelled to investigate election related issues along with some other issues.  Three election-related referrals were made to DA Heneks by the Fayette County Election Board.  Mahoney’s alleged election fraud was one of those referrals.  As then-DA Heneks and Mahoney are friends, the Grand Jury never issued a presentment against Mahoney.  In fact, there were eight presentments issued by the Grand jury.  Seven of the eight were dealt with; however, the 5th Presentment was sealed by Presiding Judge Steve P. Leskinen on 12/12/2014.  The docket sheet for Fayette County Grand Jury #2 on the Unified Judicial System database shows that the 5th Presentment remains sealed to this very day and that the status of the Grand Jury is active, although the grand jurors were dismissed nearly nine years ago! Shapiro was made aware of all this in a 2018 official complaint.”

Robert Frasconi stated: “3. In 2018, at the Fayette County Fair, the Democrats were caught offering inducements to switch political party affiliation.  This is a violation of the PA Voter Registration Act.  A formal complaint was filed by the PA GOP chairman and a hearing was held on September 10, 2018. At that hearing, Fayette County Democrat Party Chairman George “Huck” Rattay testified and took the Fifth approximately 40 times.  Mahoney also testified that a weekend stay at a condo owned by him at 84 Lumber magnate Joe Hardy’s Nemacolin Woodlands Resort was one of the inducements offered!  The matter was referred by a unanimous vote of the three-member, county, Voter Registration Commission to DA Richard E. Bower.  He said publicly that he forwarded the matter to AG Josh Shapiro because of a conflict of interest.  Bower was a Democrat who financially supported the local “Democratic Radio Hour” talk show on our local AM radio station WMBS 590.  Fayette County Democrat Chairman Rattay hosts that talk show.  Bower subsequently changed his party affiliation to Republican, but he is still the rat he was as a Democrat DA who refused to investigate Mahoney’s election fraud.  Bottom Line:  Neither Fayette County Democrat Party Chairman George Rattay nor ex-Democrat state representative Tim Mahoney ever faced investigation (let alone prosecution) for their alleged violations of the Pennsylvania Voter Registration Act.  The statute of limitations has run out (normally 2 years in Pennsylvania for misdemeanors).  In my view, Shapiro is criminally negligent for failing to investigate — a requirement under Pennsylvania law!”

“What really bothers me is the depth and breadth of the corruption, Mr. Howley.  If I or my colleague, Delinda, ever broke an election law, falsified an affidavit, lied to the court, or lied to or misled an investigating grand jury, Democrats like PA AG Josh Shapiro, former DA Jack Heneks, and current DA Rich Bower (Democrat turned RINO) would lock us up and throw away the key,” Frasconi stated.

Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ family’s slave-owning past is back in the conversation as Harris struggles to maintain her awkward persona as an African-American even though she is descended from elite Indian people on one side and a slaveowner on her Jamaican side. I wrote a pretty classic report on Harris’ past, and it’s time to revisit the story. As I exclusively reported in 2019:

Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris is descended from Irish slave owner Hamilton Brown, the namesake of Brown’s Town in Jamaica, who recruited massive numbers of Irish migrants to Jamaica to work on his sugar plantations after the British empire abolished slavery.

Kamala Harris’ father Donald Harris wrote an essay entitled “Reflections of a Jamaican Father” for Jamaica Global Online, in which he made a startling admission (emphasis added): “My roots go back, within my lifetime, to my paternal grandmother Miss Chrishy (née Christiana Brown, descendant of Hamilton Brown who is on record as plantation and slave owner and founder of Brown’s Town) and to my maternal grandmother Miss Iris (née Iris Finegan, farmer and educator, from Aenon Town and Inverness, ancestry unknown to me).  The Harris name comes from my paternal grandfather Joseph Alexander Harris, land-owner and agricultural ‘produce’ exporter (mostly pimento or all-spice), who died in 1939 one year after I was born and is buried in the church yard of the magnificent Anglican Church which Hamilton Brown built in Brown’s Town (and where, as a child, I learned the catechism, was baptized and confirmed, and served as an acolyte).”

Harris’ father’s passage ends

Hamilton Brown was not only a slave owner, but also an engineer of mass Irish migration to Jamaica after the British empire abolished slavery in 1834.

Jamaican Family Search recorded: “Hamilton Brown owned several plantations over the years 1817 to about 1845. According to the 1818 Almanac which can be found on this site, (Jamaican Family Search) , he was the owner of Minard (128 slaves) which he must have acquired from its previous owner (John Bailie) in 1815 or later. The number of slaves on this estate approximates the number of slaves in one of the registers attributed to his ownership (124 slaves). The other register (86 slaves) cannot be assigned to any estate, although he is listed in Almanacs for subsequent years as owning several, (Antrim, Grier Park, Colliston, Little River, Retirement and Unity Valley).”

It has been three years since Senator Mark Kelly stopped claiming he did not dress as Hitler.

Here’s a photo montage of Senator Mark Kelly and yearbook photos from Mark Kelly’s Merchant Marine Academy days.

Senator Mark Kelly began claiming he did not dress as Hitler after National File’s Patrick Howley broke the exclusive yearbook photos of a man who looks virtually identical to Mark Kelly dressed as Hitler just ahead of the November 3, 2020, election, infamously won by the now retiring Joe Biden.

Within minutes of breaking the exclusive, the Democrat Party scribes at Gannett-owned AZ Central had four — FOUR — of Kelly’s classmates lined up claiming that it definitely was not Mark Kelly who dressed as Hitler in that photograph from the Merchant Marine Academy.

Within days, however, National File’s reporting smoked out one of the classmates — a highly paid Defense Department contractor who went to school with Senator Mark Kelly.

Huntington Ingalls executive Jenifer Boykin, who is paid more than $4 million a year to oversee a Dept. of Defense shipyard, admitted that she did indeed pose for a photo next to a classmate dressed as Hitler.

Mark Kelly and Perkins Coie quickly sued National File, claiming that Kelly did not dress as Hitler.

After nearly a year of legal wrangling, and a scrappy defense mounted by Patrick Howley and publisher Noel Fritsch at National File, Mark Kelly and Perkins Coie filed their own motion to dismiss the claim that Kelly did not dress as Hitler.

Kelly, it seemed, preferred to focus on his campaign going into 2022 against Peter Thiel conntected GOP Senate candidate Blake Masters. Kelly ultimately defeated Masters.

Fast forward three years, and Senator Mark Kelly — the same Mark Kelly who stopped claiming he didn’t dress as Hitler — and who had before claimed that he did not dress as Hitler —  is being mentioned as a potential running mate for Kamala Harris.

Barack and Michelle Obama endorsed Kamala on Friday morning nearly a week after her ascension to the top slot on the Democrat ticket.

I appeared on The Millstone Report with Paul Harrell to discuss Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ child sex trafficking scandal, which you can read about below. Kamala Harris has a lot of big questions to answer about her record on human trafficking, which President Donald Trump should bring up as the election moves forward.

WATCH THE SEGMENT HERE:

Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris personally worked as a lawyer for the U.S. government to take a child named Jonah Rief away from his mother and the child was allegedly sex trafficked. Additionally, Harris as California attorney general oversaw a system of child sex trafficking in the foster care system where missing foster kids don’t get an Amber alert but are merely registered as “runaways” by the state. Harris’ office also met with families of children victimized by CPS child trafficking, but chose not to intervene to stop the problem.

I produced Save the Babies: A Documentary on CPS Child Trafficking (WATCH IT HERE) to expose how CPS snatches kids from homes and hospitals and allegedly funnels them into the underground world of child sex slavery. States collect Title IV Social Security money for every child adopted out of foster care, thus creating potential financial incentives for social workers to grab kids from their families and place them into foster care with no hope for family re-unification. In California, missing foster care children do not even get an Amber Alert sent out for them. They are all just labeled as runaways. Kamala Harris served as California attorney general when this system was in place. Kamala Harris’ office also met with relatives of CPS kidnapping victims but refused to follow up on the interaction and take any kind of action to help the children.

The film spotlighted Contra Costa County, California, where children have died in the CPS system a short distance away from Bohemian Grove, where globalist elites reportedly practice Moloch worship.

In the film, I explain how Kamala Harris represented the government against a mother named Tammi Rief, whose son Jonah Rief was taken away from her by a judge and allegedly sex trafficked.

Here is a clip from the movie Save the Babies regarding Kamala Harris:

Here is the movie Save the Babies. The segment on Kamala Harris appears between the 42:55 minute mark and the 44:20 mark.

Here is the document showing Kamala Harris representing the government in 2015 against mother Tammy Rief, whose son was allegedly sex trafficked:

Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ father Don Harris was repeatedly and openly identified as a Marxist professor in Stanford Daily articles from the 1970’s and even stated “I have heard no worthwhile arguments against Marxian economics” while feuding with his anti-Marxist colleagues. NATIONAL FILE has dug through the Stanford Daily archives. Here are some results showing Don Harris’ Marxism (emphasis added).

The May 15, 1975 Stanford Daily article “Marxist Offered Economics Post” states the following: “Don Harris, a prominent Marxist professor, has been offered a full professorship in the Economics Department here, Department Chairman James Rosse confirmed yesterday…The appointment is the direct result of student pressure in recent years to hire more faculty who favor an “alternative approach” to economics, said Economics Prof. John Gurley, who now teaches the only undergraduate course in Marxist economics. Gurley said the appointment of Harris was the culmination of a six-month “round-the-world” search for the most qualified Marxist professor available. Gurley called Harris “an exceptionally good teacher, outstanding researcher, and one of the leading young people in Marxist economics…With the addition of Harris, the department would be able to offer a much greater number of courses taught from a Marxist viewpoint.”

On May 21, 1975, a Stanford Daily editorial stated: “The University’s offer of a tenured position to Marxist economist Don Harris represents a welcome but long overdue action on the part of the Economics Department. The decision to hire another Marxist is primarily the result of continual pressure on the administration by concerned students, and we must commend the Economics Department for paying attention to this student input.”

Harris had previously generated controversy during his stint as a visiting professor.

On January 31, 1974, the Stanford Daily ran an editorial entitled “Econ Department Needs Marxian Profs” refers to “Marxist scholars like Don Harris.”

On March 14, 1974, the Stanford Daily reported in an article headlined “Econ Students Again Demand Expanded Marxian Program”: “But Don Harris, visiting economics professor and advocate of radical economics, suggested that the faculty recommendations hadn’t really met the students’ original demands. “[The proposals] are biased towards the graduate students. Undergrads have, to some degree, been left out. The alternative approaches’ proposal is clearly directed to the graduates,” Harris observed. “If the real objective is to provide a broad-based undergraduate program in Marxian economics, the department is going to need some more manpower,” he added.

Abramovitz, pointing to the faculty “alternative approaches” field, argued that the department would be getting needed manpower…“I have heard no worthwhile arguments against Marxian economics. [Other faculty members] view all other approaches as inferior to their own. There has really been no serious discussion of alternatives,” such as Marxian economics, Harris stated. (The Article Continues on Page 20 of That Stanford Daily Issue)…”This is an objectionable judgment which is made out of ignorance of the historical background and traditions of Marxian economics. Such ignorance is self-replacing through the training that the graduate students receive,” Harris contended.

An April 3, 1974 Stanford Daily article stated: “On March 11, a Daily article reported renewed demands by the Union for Radical Political Economics (URPE) on the Economics Dept. for a commitment to teaching Marxian economics. Statements by department chairman Moses Abramovitz quoted in that article constitute a clear attempt on his part to obscure and distort the issues. Abramovitz cited “the Marxian economics workshop that is now a regular departmental seminar, a graduate theory course on Marx, Don Harris’ courses, and the recently approved field of study in ‘alternative approaches to economic analysis.'”

His list sounds impressive until you look more closely. Harris’ courses will end this spring when his contract expires; departmental failure to consider a tenure offer to Harris was one reason we drafted our recent statement. The seminar is now sponsored by Gurley and Harris; Harris will be gone next year, and Gurley will be on leave Autumn quarter.”

President Donald Trump’s campaign stated that Trump will not commit to debating Kamala Harris yet because it is still unclear who the Democrat presidential nominee will actually be.

“Given the continued political chaos surrounding Crooked Joe Biden and the Democrat Party, general election debate details cannot be finalized until Democrats formally decide on their nominee,” Trump’s campaign stated, according to a statement on Trump’s Truth Social account.

“There is a strong sense by many in the Democrat Party — namely Barack Hussein Obama — that Kamala Harris is a Marxist fraud who cannot beat President Trump, and they are still holding out for someone “better.” Therefore, it would be inappropriate to schedule things with Harris because Democrats very well could still change their minds,” the Trump campaign said.

The next presidential debate is scheduled for September 10, and Harris has committed. Harris is known as a terrible debater whose own Democrat primary campaign evaporated in the primaries in 2020 and whose vice presidential debate performance dragged down her ticket when she ran with Joe Biden.

Kamala is raising a lot of donor money, and her husband Doug Emhoff (a former partner at the D.C. law firm DLA Piper) is clearly a savvy money guy who is operating behind the scenes. But Kamala is still politically weak and there’s no guarantee that she will be Trump’s eventual challenger.

Joe Biden dropped out of the presidential race after Trump destroyed him in the CNN debate. Biden is clearly suffering from cognitive decline that may be a case of Parkinson’s dementia. Democrats are in crisis.

Donald J. Harris, the father of presumptive Democrat presidential nominee and Biden shotgun rider Kamala Harris slammed the “fraudulent” claims she made around her racial and cultural background in 2019, during her short-lived run for the presidency, accusing his daughter of bringing shame to the Harris family name “in the pursuit of identity politics.”

Kamala Harris claimed in a 2019 interview on The Breakfast Club radio program, the very same program on which Hillary Clinton made her infamous hot sauce remarks, that despite her career as an anti-marijuana prosecutor, she supports its legalization and used to smoke it while listening to rap music because “half my family is from Jamaica, are you kidding me?”

The interview came shortly after Harris, who is the daughter of an Indian mother and a Jamaican father, announced her run for the Democrats’ 2020 presidential nomination on Martin Luther King Jr. day, casting herself as an African-American as she has throughout her political career, despite her lack of ancestral links to the formerly enslaved population of the United States.

“My dear departed grandmothers…as well as my deceased parents, must be turning in their graves right now to see their family’s name, reputation, and proud Jamaican identity being connected, in any way, jokingly or not, with the fraudulent stereotype of a pot-smoking joy seeker and in the pursuit of identity politics,” Donald Harris said a statement he made to the Jamaica Global Online.

“Speaking for myself and my immediate Jamaican family, we wish to categorically dissociate ourselves from this travesty.”

Related: Even BLM Opposes Kamala Harris

Donald Harris’s remarks have resurfaced in the days since Joe Biden announced he’s dropping out of the 2024 Presidential Election and endorsing Harris, his Vice President, who was unable to poll outside of the low single digits among her own party when she ran for their 2020 nomination.

Because of the Harris campaign and the corporate media’s hyper-fixation on her racial and ethnic background, the fact that her paternal ancestors were slave owners has also resurfaced in recent days.

According to a report from The Irish Times,

Ms Harris is the daughter of Donald J Harris, who was born in Jamaica, and Shyamala Gopalan Harris from India.

Genealogical research carried out by Northern Irish historian Stephen McCracken reveals Ms Harris’s four-times-paternal-great-grandfather Hamilton Brown was born in Co Antrim [Ireland] in 1776.

Brown emigrated to Jamaica, then a British colony, and became an enthusiastic slave owner on the sugar plantations that were the mainstay of the island’s economy. He opposed the abolition of slavery across the British Empire in 1832 and went to Antrim to replace his slaves with workers from his native county.

…

Brown received almost €11 million in modern money in compensation from the British government for [the emancipation of] his slaves.

NATIONAL FILE EXCLUSIVE: Kamala Harris Accused Of Putting A Child Into Sex Trafficking And Covering Up CPS Child Trafficking

Unsurprisingly, Kamala’s first digital missive lambastes Donald Trump for Kangaroo Court criminal “convictions.”

Laughably, Kamala paints herself as the candidate who wants a country “where no one is above the law.”

We’re not holding our breath for her prosecution of the Biden Criminal Cartel.

The ad attempts to hang its hat on Harris’ time spent as a prosecutor, and tries to avoid California’s current plight while trying to paint her as anti-chaos, as opposed to a Rule-of-Law Republican ticket she claims is bent on chaos.

What do you think? Is Kamala’s first advert honest or not?

WATCH:

Kamala’s ad comes a day after Deep State Dave McCormick made the case to keep the filibuster in his new ad attacking Bob Casey for backing Kamala.

Bob Casey just endorsed the most liberal nominee in U.S. history. pic.twitter.com/J0V6W7CUlh

— Dave McCormick (@DaveMcCormickPA) July 23, 2024

Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris personally worked as a lawyer for the U.S. government to take a child named Jonah Rief away from his mother and the child was allegedly sex trafficked. Additionally, Harris as California attorney general oversaw a system of child sex trafficking in the foster care system where missing foster kids don’t get an Amber alert but are merely registered as “runaways” by the state. Harris’ office also met with families of children victimized by CPS child trafficking, but chose not to intervene to stop the problem.

I produced Save the Babies: A Documentary on CPS Child Trafficking (WATCH IT HERE) to expose how CPS snatches kids from homes and hospitals and allegedly funnels them into the underground world of child sex slavery. States collect Title IV Social Security money for every child adopted out of foster care, thus creating potential financial incentives for social workers to grab kids from their families and place them into foster care with no hope for family re-unification. In California, missing foster care children do not even get an Amber Alert sent out for them. They are all just labeled as runaways. Kamala Harris served as California attorney general when this system was in place. Kamala Harris’ office also met with relatives of CPS kidnapping victims but refused to follow up on the interaction and take any kind of action to help the children.

The film spotlighted Contra Costa County, California, where children have died in the CPS system a short distance away from Bohemian Grove, where globalist elites reportedly practice Moloch worship.

In the film, I explain how Kamala Harris represented the government against a mother named Tammi Rief, whose son Jonah Rief was taken away from her by a judge and allegedly sex trafficked.

Here is a clip from the movie Save the Babies regarding Kamala Harris:

Here is the movie Save the Babies. The segment on Kamala Harris appears between the 42:55 minute mark and the 44:20 mark.

Here is the document showing Kamala Harris representing the government in 2015 against mother Tammy Rief, whose son was allegedly sex trafficked: