Owner of X, Elon Musk, announced on X that USMC veteran and prominent influencer Lucas Gage was suspended after “repeated and clear calls for violence.”

The Tuesday post on X comes on the heels of the seven or more times Gage has been swatted in the past week. The veteran maintains his innocence against clear libel from the richest man in the world, Musk.

Musk provided a follow-up to the inquiry from the account “1984,” replying with a screenshotted post from Gage that he says “triggered the 6-month suspension.”

X-users swarmed to the defense of Gage, showing screenshot after screenshot of abuse from Zionists who have largely remained unpunished for their calls to violence or the removal of people from their lands.

Many more posts demonstrate the Zionists’ abuse and call to violence, in particular. Here is one from outspoken Zionist Jew Dr. Eli David, co-founder of Tel Aviv’s Deep Instinct cybersecurity.

Both posts on X by Musk were easily ratioed, proving “Vox Populi, Vox Dei.” The people have spoken and are largely against Gage’s suspension. A poll by former US senatorial candidate Sam Parker demonstrates this further.

This may not mean much to Musk, although he has repeatedly stated that the decisions of the X platform are ultimately left up to the people — Vox Populi, Vox Dei.

Musk, after being coerced to visit the Auschwitz Concentration Camp with The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro, has certainly changed his tone and approach. He completely stopped talking about the abusive power of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). This Jewish organization attempted to destroy the X platform after Musk’s purchase with several advertiser boycotts.

It is almost as if Musk has now taken a priority stance for the Jewish demographic. It may seem that way because of the Oct. 7 attack against Israel, or perhaps it is all just out of fear.

Whether Gage’s 6-month suspension is justified is unknown. X’s policies on violence may appear straightforward, but its implementation is another story. There has been a clear shift in the so-called “free-speech platform” X, almost as if it is now engaged in the same DEI and special interest nonsense that Musk once railed against.

X’s internal AI, Grok, offered this perspective that “context matters” and that “burning a book or flag [is] not always a free speech free-for-all.” However, it states that “burning the American flag” is “protected under the First Amendment.” So, the assumption is a flag of a foreign country, Israel, is not, at least according to X. Grok also said, “burning a book … in a way that’s intended to intimate or threaten others … could be … a hate crime…”

At this point, it all seems too obvious. To X, burning the Israeli flag is intimidation, but not when you burn the US flag. As far as burning the Talmud, a Jewish text stating Jesus Christ is boiling in a vat of excrement, is considered not okay and threatening to Jews.

EXCLUSIVE: Harassment Campaign Heightens Against Outspoken USMC Veteran

The priorities of X have aligned with the rest of the so-called “establishment” to simply maintain the ordered hierarchy that is so evident in Western societies. Lucas Gage is one of the few who outwardly threaten that status quo; thus, he faces tremendous reprisals.

Lucas Gage: Look Toward Counter Cancel Culture Industry

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee reigns supreme after adding an additional 17 Democratic primary victories as it remains undefeated so far in this election cycle. All the while, progressives smear the NGO as “right-wing.”

AIPAC celebrated its dominance over American politics after its primary victories, sharing in a post on X, “Being pro-Israel is good policy and good politics.” The NGO has now secured nearly 200 members of special interest caucuses, including the Equality Caucus, the Asian-Pacific American Caucus, the Progressive Caucus, the Black Caucus and the Hispanic Caucus.

According to Politico, AIPAC plans to spend a whopping $100 million targeting candidates who have been openly critical of Israel and its actions against the Palestinian people post-Oct. 7.

Democratic California state Sen. Dave Min has felt the fire and fury of the Israel lobby with a range of ads focusing on his DUI arrest last year. Min had called for a permanent cease-fire in Gaza and has been critical of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He referred to AIPAC’s aggressions as being “swamped” by outside spending. Min, however, won his primary and will face off with Republican Scott Baugh. Still, he worries about AIPAC “wiping” progressives out.

A Democratic donor adviser sounded off similarly, telling Politico, “They’ll have so much money, wherever there’s an opportunity, they will take it.” Politico refrained from mentioning the person’s identity as it is almost viewed as uncouth to take a stance against Israel or criticize the actions of Israel’s foreign lobbyists.

In fact, in 2023, Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., an outspoken Palestinian-American, was censured by Congress for comments about Israel. She said:

It is important to separate people and government. The idea that criticizing the government of Israel is antisemitic sets a very dangerous precedent. And it’s been used to silence diverse voices speaking up for human rights across our nation.

Leveraging accusations of antisemitism has been vital to AIPAC’s footing, but progressives have hit back, falsely linking the lobby to Republicans and racism. Albeit, most Republicans in office are pro-Israel, but AIPAC campaigns for both parties.

The Israel lobby is the top fundraiser for Democrats, including the Black Caucus, Hispanic Caucus and Asian-Pacific American Caucus. Still, that doesn’t deter progressives from utilizing the NGO’s image to champion their campaigns. To them, the October 7 attack against Israel is seen as the mobilization of Republican donors, which isn’t true based on the enormous hustle for pro-Israel Democrats backed by AIPAC. Even with this information, this does not deter progressives from a good campaign narrative.

Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo., said in a statement, “AIPAC and their Republican mega-donors are targeting black and brown Democratic incumbents with the same right-wing playbook across the country.”

Usamah Andrabi, communications director for Justice Democrats, said much the same:

A handful of Republican billionaire mega-donors are using AIPAC to spend in Democratic primaries against black and brown progressives, funding primary campaigns against the most popular and progressive members, so this should be a scandal.

Jeremy Ben-Ami, president of the progressive pro-Israel group J Street, also regards AIPAC as being the “arm of the Republican Party.” He told Politico:

[AIPAC] is doing the dirty work of the [Republican National Committee] when it drives a wedge in the Democratic Party. The strategy is to ensure that the mainstream of the Democratic Party understands exactly how extreme and toxic AIPAC has become.

Meanwhile, AIPAC spokesperson Marshall Wittmann countered such claims, saying that support for candidates is purely based on “their commitment to strengthen the US-Israel relationship.”

We support scores of progressive candidates including the Democratic leadership and nearly half of the membership of the congressional Progressive Caucus, Black Caucus and Hispanic Caucus. In fact, we are the largest PAC contributor to Democratic candidates.

The reality here is that AIPAC is a threat to the ideological progressives. Their accusations of racism or backing Republican causes are, by evidence, unfounded. This could possibly provide an avenue to oust some progressives as their intel is not valid, and AIPAC has almost insurmountable funding. This is evidenced in New York with Rep. Jamal Bowman’s defeat but countered by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s unabashed victory. Still, without a doubt, the survival of the progressives is challenged by AIPAC and the unfathomed depth of the NGO’s pockets.

After conservative commentator Candace Owens’ dismissal from the Daily Wire, her dissident side slowly diminished, aside from some “degeneracy” remarks. It is almost as if she is tepid to be independent, leaning towards the mainstream.

Anyone and everybody in the news media knows well that questioning Israel or Jews is a “no-no” and will render you canceled. Owens, among other black conservatives, including the Hodge Twins, thought she could win the gamble.

The Hodge Twins (@hodgetwins) have joined forces with Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO), railing against Israel, supposed "antisemitism," and the Daily Wire.

Black conservatives remain true to America First as the biggest critics of foreign intervention. pic.twitter.com/BCAoll5Jad

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) March 31, 2024

Now that the Daily Wire has placed a gag order on Owens, it is very unlikely we will see the earth-shattering debate between her and establishment con Ben Shapiro. So then, where is she headed? Will she be independent? Or will she bow and return to the mainstream media?

This isn’t accurate. I wasn’t following Charlie and I definitely did not delete any photos.

We have a lot of discussions off line and we’ve both grown a lot since the early days of TPUSA.

There’s just no beef between us.

— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) May 9, 2024

The go-to-news-aggregator, AF Post, posted that Owens had unfollowed TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk and deleted all images of the two on her social media accounts. She refuted the claim by saying, “We have a lot of discussions offline, and we’ve both grown a lot since the early days of TPUSA. There’s just no beef between us.”

America First Candace Owens Strides Past Neocon Establishment

Kirk is known for his staunch pro-Israel stance and had not supported Owens when she was heavily ridiculed for alleged antisemitism. She has also reposted from several previous colleges, like Matt Walsh, who did not come to her defense. It appears she doesn’t want to burn bridges and wants to remain in the mainstream while somehow retaining her Dissident Right voice. That seems wholly unlikely unless she starts up a new brand.

Surprising from an outlet that has no problem doxxing Christian Nationalists.

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) May 8, 2024

On Wednesday, Owens posted a Wall Street Journal editorial advocating for Christian Nationalists. What is ironic here is that this is a News Corp outlet. News Corp is Zionist to the core and has had no problem in the past blasting the Dissident Right and Christian Nationalism. For Owens, it seems very difficult to realize her stance is diametrically opposed to the people she praises and the outlets she promotes.

We got you, Candace @NationalFile where Christ is King and America’s First. https://t.co/dGN4Xc3eYh

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) March 24, 2024

It is too early to predict where she is going with her career, but it is easy to see that she, in a sense, manipulates the Dissident Right for her own defense. Groypers and the Dissident Right act as a collective and never fold. With that, this audience works toward her advantage.

X Reinstates Paleocon Commentator Nicholas J. Fuentes

If Owens was truly devoted to the America First cause, she would help her supporters in media — the columnists and reporters that backed her and became blacklisted, rather than elevating content from those who referred to her as an antisemite.

Hey folks!

Turning Point Action is hosting our MASSIVE People’s Convention in Detroit this June 14-16

Thousands of patriots will be in attendance and we have an incredible speaking roster including President Trump and many others!

Check out https://t.co/fKANJfbHZT to register! pic.twitter.com/bwxrdqpCO4

— Gabe Guidarini (@GabeGuidarini) May 9, 2024

Another perspective is that she is simply trying to retain those contacts to build her brand in the future. Dissident Right or America First outlets are continually dwindling, but this could be a big chance to even the score.

Candace Owens Takes Aim at the Jewish Lobby

There’s a lot of hope for Candace Owens, but understanding the dynamics of news media puts her at odds with America First. The question is whether she will compromise in the mainstream and be forced to dismiss America First conservativism. Or will she open an outlet that will be truly free speech and allow the canceled to have a chance at their journalistic profession? It may take months to find out, and certainly don’t expect an appearance at AFPACIV — she’s booked for the adjacent event, Turning Point Action.

Matt Walsh: ‘Bow Before Israel (unless you’re an anti-Semite)!’

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Cabinet, on a unanimous vote on Sunday, decided to close down the Al Jazeera broadcast station in Israel.

According to The Hill, Netanyahu said, “The government headed by me unanimously decided: the incitement channel Al Jazeera will be closed in Israel.”

הממשלה בראשותי החליטה פה אחד: ערוץ ההסתה אל ג׳זירה ייסגר בישראל.

תודה לשר @shlomo_karhi

— Benjamin Netanyahu – בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) May 5, 2024

Al Jazeera responded by denying the accusation, reported The Associated Press, although the outlet based in Qatar stands as really the last beacon of a non-Zionist perspective.

The AP also noted that the English broadcast is similar to major networks, but its Arabic version allegedly publishes straight verbatim from Hamas and other Islamic militant groups. However, that claim has not been sourced by the AP or backed up.

Al Jazeera posted a statement on X, stating Netanyahu’s Cabinet move was “banning media service providers from transmitting its broadcasts and blocking Al Jazeera Media Network websites.” It also remarked that this comes on World Press Freedom Day, calling the move a “criminal act that violates human rights and the basic right to access to information.”

Al Jazeera then accuses Israel of the “killing of journalists” and “arrests” during the war on Gaza. It finally stated that it would pursue all legal avenues and that “Targeting journalists is a crime.”

"If you’re watching this… then Al Jazeera has been banned in Israel."

Al Jazeera's @ajimran recorded his last report from occupied East Jerusalem, pre-empting the Netanyahu gov't’s unanimous decision to close Al Jazeera in Israel pic.twitter.com/ZOzqxpSKGJ

— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) May 5, 2024

The Hill admits that the effects of Netayanhu’s cabinet are not so evident. However, the AP reported that Al Jazeera broadcasted how the effects would weigh on its operations in Israel.

One correspondent said it would not affect the coverage of the Palestinian territories. Another said the order blocked the channel from “holding offices or operating them” in Israel and that the website would ultimately blocked in Israel. Senior political analyst for Al Jazeera, Marwan Bishara, said this move proves that Israel “is not a democratic state.”

House Passes Antisemitism Hate Speech Bill Curbing Free Speech

The decision by Netanyhu’s cabinet to censor an adversarial press comes on the heels of cease-fire talk, which, ironically, Qatar is trying to broker between Israel and Hamas. One can imagine that Israel seems unwilling to talk after censoring Al Jazeera.

Long Island Rep. D’Esposito’s New Bill Criminalizes Anti-Zionism Through IHRA’s ‘Working Definition’

Americans seem dumbfounded as their highest political representatives in Washington, D.C. call for laws to ban certain forms of speech – specifically statements that voice criticism of Israel and the political ideology of Zionism – even equating such expressions with support for terrorism.

But this response becomes less surprising given the legal, operational and intelligence construct which has been erected over nearly a decade, centered on the concept of “antisemitism.”

A deeper look into the origins of these efforts reveals that the mission to ban certain forms of speech in America have been long in the making.

The most recent – and perhaps so far the most draconian effort – is the Antisemitism Awareness Act, which was passed by Congress on May 1.

BROAD DEFINITIONS OF “ANTISEMITISM”

According to U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), the intent of the bill is to accelerate hate crime prosecutions of those protesting against the Israel-Gaza war on college campuses – using broad definitions of “antisemitism.”

According to the Antisemitism Awareness Act, the definitions of what constitute “antisemitic” hate speech violations are stipulated in a list published by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). For example, according to this body of definitions, “Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations” would qualify as hate speech.

Lara Friedman, in a 2020 article in Jewish Currents, provides a stern warning about these IHRA-based laws and their Constitutional implications:

“Parts of that definition conflate antisemitism with both criticism of Israel and anti-Zionism; as a result, the implications of this new legislation for free speech are alarming,” she states.

Jewish scholar Kenneth Stern, who wrote the IHRA, claims that it has been “subverted” and that it was never intended to shut down free speech:

“There was never any idea that this would be used as a de facto hate speech code on campus,” he told The Times of Israel in 2020.

You need to understand how crazy this antisemitism bill is that just passed the House with wide bipartisan approval. The law requires the Department of Education to adopt the definition of antisemitism provided by something called the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) May 1, 2024

WHO WRITES THESE BILLS?

The Foundation for Middle East Peace states that since 2016, there have been efforts in Congress and U.S. states “to pass legislation that is framed as being about fighting antisemitism, but that in practice […] is about targeting non-violent protest, activism, and criticism of Israel and/or Zionism.”

However, a closer look reveals that these legislative efforts do not originate from U.S. politicians. Instead, they have been driven by wealthy Israeli expats in collusion with Netanyahu’s government.

In a leaked 2020 email, Florida State Rep. Randy Fine explains the machinations behind the first Florida “antisemitism bill” – HB 741, which was signed by Governor DeSantis in Israel the preceding year. The law focused on shutting down anti-Israel activities on university campuses in the state.

Fine identifies an individual by the name of Joseph Sabag as the architect of the bill.

“In addition, Joe Sabag at the Israeli-American Coalition for Action was instrumental in providing outside support as I pushed the bill and I would highly recommend anyone considering such an effort speak with him,” Fine writes in an email to fellow state representatives in Oklahoma, Kansas, North Carolina and Arkansas – in a drive to get similar legislation enacted in those jurisdictions as well.

Rep. Fine also indicates that he’s impressed with how the legislation has been structured:

“The elegance of the solution is two-fold: 1) we avoid debate over ‘what is anti-Semitism’ by relying on the world’s most recognized definition. 2) We leverage decades of legal precedent in limiting racist speech, groups on campus, acts by faculty and administrators, etc. and simply apply it to anti-Semitism,” Fine writes.

In a follow-up email, Sabag responds to Fine and the other state lawmakers:

“My legal team has now taken Randy’s bill and refined it into a model that can be brought elsewhere. I urge you to please contact me or Rep. Alan Clemmons and take advantage of our policy support if you are considering filing a bill. We are here to serve,” Sabag writes.

JOSEPH SABAG: THE ARCHITECT

Mr. Sabag, a 2005 graduate of the Florida International University’s College of Law, is an attorney attached to an organization called the Israeli American Council (IAC).

“As an attorney and policy specialist, Joe has been a sought consultant for numerous lawmakers at the state and federal levels over the past decade. In just the last 6 years, he has led drafting and successful advocacy of legislation and key policy resolutions supporting Israel and combatting anti-Semitism in over two-thirds the states in America,” the IAC’s website states.

In a 2019 opinion piece for The Daily Wire, Sabag identifies himself as “the primary legal expert” behind the new antisemitism laws – stating plainly what is to come:

“[…] legislation regulating against anti-Semitism is likely to be enacted in various American states in response to the mounting persecution of Jews.”

Sabag argues that his laws are compatible with the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution:

“Critics of legislation addressing the problem of unlawful anti-Semitic activity wrongly argue that it somehow infringes upon free speech rights. However, the First Amendment does not protect criminal and discriminatory conduct — which is what these laws solely address,” he claims.

This begs the question: why are special laws for Jewish Americans necessary, when criminal conduct is already amply regulated in local, state and federal legislation?

In his commentary, Sabag states that various student organizations and activist groups, such as the Boycott, Divest and Sanction movement and Students for Justice in Palestine as “terror-affiliated” and that they are promoting arguments of “Jewish subversion, conspiracy, dual loyalty, greed, economic control, and most insidiously, blood libels.”

IAC: THE COMMAND CENTER

Sabag’s mother organization, the Israeli American Council, keeps a lower profile in their work to impact U.S. legislation and lawmakers than the more well-known lobby group, AIPAC.

The nonprofit’s states that its mission is to “preserve and strengthen the Israeli and Jewish identities of future generations, strengthen the American Jewish community, and strengthen the relationship between citizens of the United States and the State of Israel.”

The biggest funders of IAC are now-deceased casino mogul Sheldon Adelson and Israeli-American billionaire Haim Saban – the latter also a long-time supporter of Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party. The organization is led by Elan Carr, a former Los Angeles prosecutor and military officer who previously served as U.S. Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism – “directing U.S. policy and programs aimed at combating Jew-hatred throughout the world,” according to the IAC’s website.

Carr was deployed to Iraq during the U.S. occupation, where he reportedly “led an anti-terrorism team.”

Nearly all senior staff at IAC seem to have received their eduction in Israel, and most names are Hebrew-sounding, and many resources on its web site are only accessible in Hebrew.

The organization’s advisory board includes wealthy and influential dual citizens. The organization is co-chaired by Avi Almozlino, a physician, and Tal Shuster, a former Israeli military and foreign affairs officer.

One of the IAC’s major supporters – Adam Milstein – who also goes by the name Tuvia Milsztein – is a wealthy real estate magnate and a convicted felon. In 2009, he was sentenced to three months in prison for felony tax evasion. The Israeli government, via Consul General Jacob Dayan, attempted to intervene on his behalf by highlighting his philanthropic activities. But prosecutors were unimpressed, warning of “an obvious concern that much of his philanthropy appears to have been merely a device to defraud the government.”

Milstein is involved in an intricate network of organizations and initiatives – a self-described “ecosystem” – to manipulate the U.S. private and public sectors, including law and civil society, into subservience to Israeli-Jewish interests under the auspices of “fighting antisemitism.”

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE AGAINST AMERICANS

Adam Milstein’s fellow IAC donor, media mogul Haim Saban, has been clear about where his true loyalties lie.

“Our interest is to take care of Israel’s interest in the United States. Period. Over and out,” he said at a secret fundraising summit held in Las Vegas in 2015.

Forward reports that the purpose of the meeting was to lay the groundwork for anti-BDS laws and launch efforts to “fight antisemitism” on U.S. college campuses.

Nearly ten years ago now, Adelson opened the Las Vegas meeting by reading a letter from Benjamin Netanyahu, in which the Israeli leader called for all hands on deck in order to “combat the lies and slander that are leveled against us.”

When the night was over, the clandestine group had $50 million in its war chest. Tens of millions more would be added from covert sources, shell corporations and Israeli government fronts, according to veteran journalist James Bamford.

“At the same time the Las Vegas gathering was taking place, Netanyahu was meeting with his top national security and intelligence officials. The objective was the launch of a political and psychological war targeting Americans on behalf of Israel,” Bamford explains – detailing a “narrative warfare operation” designated Project Butterfly – developed and managed by a Mossad-connected Israeli intelligence contractor called Psy-Group.

The tools employed by these foreign actors against American citizens, Bamford argues, are “efforts to destroy the reputations of students and faculty, subjecting people to unwarranted investigations, and charges of ‘persecution,’ that is, endless phony accusations of ‘antisemitism,’ as well as false and slanderous accounts provided to national cable and broadcast news organizations.”

“In other words, by creating fake news outlets, phony Facebook personas and posts, and other forms of information warfare, Psy-Group’s goal was to deliberately deceive the American public about Israel and its actions against the Palestinians,” Bamford states.

Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, the government of Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claim that the country fully respects the sovereignty of the United States of America and that Israel refrains from meddling in domestic U.S. affairs.

“We don’t intervene in American politics, and we expect to be treated with the same respect,” Israeli government spokesman Tal Heinrich told Newsmax in mid-March.

Greg Reese, an “anti-government” writer and researcher, released a video on X called “The Zionist Death Grip On The United States Government.”

The five-minute InfoWars video was reposted by National File’s founder, Alex Jones, who has been keeping his nose clean of any controversial entanglements.

The Zionist Death Grip On The United States Government pic.twitter.com/CIQyE6DSpk

— Greg Reese (@gregreese) April 30, 2024

Reese began the video with Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu demanding the pro-Palestine protests to be stopped in the States, to which the government complied. He said it is because “our members of Congress have all been bought and paid for with tax dollars given to the American Israeli Political Action Committee.”

From there, he highlights the power and might of AIPAC, which does not need to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).

According to the clip, in 1962, AIPAC was originally the American Zionist Council (AZC). President John F. Kennedy, who was not biased toward Israel, ordered the NGO to register as a foreign agent. The Zionists, along with members of the US government, fought against Kennedy. A month before his assassination, the forms were prepared for AZC’s new redesignation. Since then, Israel has never been asked to register under FARA.

Reese dove into the 1967 attack on the USS Liberty by Israel, murdering 34 Americans and injuring over 171. He claimed that the US government helped Israel cover up the attack as an accident.

Then he pivoted to 9/11, where five Israelis who were seen photographing the collapse of the Twin Towers were celebrating. The account was reported by The New York Times and Haaretz but is still considered an “antisemitic conspiracy” by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).

According to Reese, one Israeli caught even stated, “Israel now has hope that the world will understand us.” The federal documents had redacted their answer as to whether they had foreknowledge of the attack, but when they appeared on Israeli TV a few months later, they confirmed they had known of the attack.

Reese went deeper into the 9/11 story, showing the group had fake student IDs and art students had infiltrated government buildings. Over 100 of these art students were arrested. Fox News’s Carl Cameron reported they had backgrounds in explosives, military intelligence, and electronic surveillance. There can’t be much of a follow-up on this since Fox News removed the already-aired clip from its general archives after interference by government agencies, according to Salon.

In March of 2000, several students were part of the “World Views Artist-in-Residence” program that occupied floors 90 and 91, where walls were unfinished and structural beams were exposed, reported Reese. One member of the group, Hanan Sarfati, was arrested by the DEA as part of the Israeli spy ring. The 14 other Israeli’s identifications were never released to the public.

Reese explained that Austrian artists known as Gelatin shared the space with them. They had been working on the “B-Thing” that involved removing the glass windows on the 91st floor of the North Tower. A small balcony was constructed so that photographs could be taken of them. Reese said another group called “E-Team” managed the helicopter. Their exhibit was scheduled to open on September 11, 2001.

He continued that in March of 2001, E-Team had an art project called “127 windows.” According to official records, they were planning to write their name on the tower’s exterior. American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the exact spot where they were supposedly preparing to do this.

Long Island Rep. D’Esposito’s New Bill Criminalizes Anti-Zionism Through IHRA’s ‘Working Definition’

Reese said in 2001, Gelitin published a book on the project, calling it all “conspiratory work.” Gelitin had also changed its name from Gelitin in 2005. The 9/11 Commission Report curiously does not mention any of the art groups.

Matt Walsh: ‘Bow Before Israel (unless you’re an anti-Semite)!’

After a turbulent six-month standoff on whether or not Ukraine would receive additional aid and how much taxpayer money would go to Israel, President Joe Biden signed the supplemental foreign aid package on Wednesday in addition to legislation forcing ByteDance to sell TikTok.

The aid to Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan, amounting to $95 billion, was passed in the House on Saturday, while it was passed just this Tuesday in the Senate. The President sounded off, saying:

The path to my desk was a difficult path. It should have been easier and it should’ve gotten there sooner. But in the end we did what America always does, we rose to the moment.

According to CNBC, Biden had announced his plans to sign the bills after the House passed them on Saturday. The Senate, then on Tuesday, remarkably passed the package with bipartisan support with a vote of 79-18, including 29 Republicans voting in the affirmative.

The grand foreign investment includes $61 billion to Ukraine, $26 billion to Israel and $8 billion to Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific. CNBC reported that the package also requires ByteDance to sell its popular social media platform, TikTok, within nine months or after Biden decides to provide a 90-day extension. If the Chinese company fails to do so, TikTok will face a nationwide ban.

TikTok Policy responded on X to the demands as “unconstitutional” and would “challenge it in court.”

The fact is, we have invested billions of dollars to keep U.S. data safe and our platform free from outside influence and manipulation. This ban would devastate seven million businesses and silence 170 million Americans.

Our Statement on Enactment of the TikTok Ban:

This unconstitutional law is a TikTok ban, and we will challenge it in court. We believe the facts and the law are clearly on our side, and we will ultimately prevail. The fact is, we have invested billions of dollars to keep U.S.…

— TikTok Policy (@TikTokPolicy) April 24, 2024

TikTok has remained the sole platform for the proliferation of pro-Palestine content. Many Zionist commentators have remarked along that tone, pushing for the ban, while free-speech conservatives have pushed back. Jewish Zionist NGOs have had heavy footing on the other social media platforms, which is believed to be why the US government has been so stringent on TikTok.

Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-NE) comes right out and admits it: they're about to ban TikTok because "young people are getting their news" from the app, and "pro-Palestinian" hashtags generate lots of views. He says Chinese Communists are "pushing this racist agenda" to undermine America pic.twitter.com/ahcRcnXXfU

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) April 23, 2024

Recall that only a few months ago, during the #BanTheADL campaign on X targeting the Anti-Defamation League’s censorship brigade, Elon Musk met with several Jewish leaders and Ben Shapiro to reevaluate the platform. Musk ended up visiting the Auschwitz Concentration Camp at the behest of the leaders, and now the platform has seen unprecedented censorship and boosting of Zionist content.

The only true free speech platform is and has been for quite sometime is Andrew Torba’s Gab, which is banned on all major provider stores, including Apple and Android. Gab has been labeled all sorts of things, ironically, by the Jewish NGOs that embrace censorship.

29 GOP Senators Vote to Approve Supplemental Foreign Aid Package

The ultimate takeaway is that America is back to being the global police with a massive and questionably justifiable payout to several foreign nations. Add to it, now Gen Z’s favored social media platform is likely to face a national ban.

Speaker Johnson Ignores Border to Pass Supplemental Foreign Aid Bill

The Democrat-controlled Senate on Tuesday approved and is now making the final pass for the Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan supplemental aid package, which advanced last week in the House.

Overwhelmingly, senators, including 29 Republicans, voted to keep the aid to $95 billion, which would be an astounding $61 billion for Ukraine, $26 billion for Israel, and $8 billion for Taiwan, reported The Hill. It would also include alleged national security items like a possible TikTok ban but zero dollars for the southern border.

Very pleased that the United States Senate overwhelmingly voted to move forward on the assistance package for Ukraine, Taiwan, and Israel.

Israel is in a fight for their very existence. They need support and they need it now.

It is better to help Ukraine fight the Russian…

— Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) April 23, 2024

A final vote will occur as early as Tuesday if both parties yield time. If not it would be set to occur on Wednesday night. According to The Hill, both parties have tried to amend the four-bill package.

It is expected that Democrats will widely accept the bills for passage and about half of the Republicans, putting it over the necessary amount of votes. Tuesday’s vote saw Senate Republicans who were against the previous bill vote to advance the package, reported The Hill. They include Sens. Katie Britt, Ala., Deb Fischer, Neb., Tom Cotton, Ark., Lindsey Graham, S.C., James Lankford, Okla., Cindy Hyde-Smith, Miss., Pete Ricketts, Neb., Markwayne Mullin, Okla., and Tim Scott, S.C. It was also reported that Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., voted in favor of cloture after voting against the previous package.

It has been approximately two years since Kyiv received US taxpayer funding, and now, after the Democrats thwarted Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., it will get paid once again. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., boasted:

Today, the Senate sits for a test on behalf of the entire nation. It’s a test of American resolve, our readiness, and our willingness to lead. And the stakes of failure are abundantly clear. Failure to help Ukraine stand against Russian aggression now means inviting escalation against our closest treaty allies and trading partners.

Republicans claimed not to move forward with the aid to Ukraine unless it included a border package. Lankford, Sens. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., and Krysten Sinema, I-Ariz., pushed a bipartisan bill in February that was subpar and crushed by Republicans along with former President Donald Trump, reported The Hill.

"I think we've turned the corner on the isolationist movement."

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell speaks about the advance of the foreign aid package. pic.twitter.com/w7qBsnMnUT

— NEWSMAX (@NEWSMAX) April 23, 2024

Still, nearly 30 Senate Republicans voted for the package’s passage. McConnell used this as a chance to rebuff conservative isolationists of America First:

So much of the hesitation and shortsightedness that has delayed this moment is premised on sheer fiction. And I take no pleasure in rebutting misguided fantasies. I wish, sincerely, that recognizing the responsibilities of American leadership was the price of admission for serious conversations about the future of our national security.

Make no mistake: Delay in providing Ukraine the weapons to defend itself has strained the prospects of defeating Russian aggression. Dithering and hesitation have compounded the challenges we face.

Speaker Johnson Ignores Border to Pass Supplemental Foreign Aid Bills

The $95 billion in supplemental aid was pigeoned as a win for “national security” but may have been a mere necessity for career politicians to keep their lobbyists at bay. Politicians nor the media have not noted any future appropriations for the southern border, focusing solely on the foreign entities the taxpayer just fronted.

Congress Calls for Immediate Vote on $95 Billion Foreign Aid Bill

An Israeli professor at Columbia University wants New York Governor Kathy Hochul to deploy the National Guard to the school to combat pro-Palestine protestors amid the ongoing war on Gaza, which has seen ethnoreligious conflicts from the Middle East spill over into the diversified United States.

Jewish-Israeli Columbia University professor, Shai Davidai has quickly become the face of the pro-Israel faction of demonstrators at Columbia University, after going viral while casting himself as a victim of students and school employees that he and his peers claim are Hamas supporters and neo-Nazis, because they’re protesting against Israel’s war effort and America’s funding of it.

In one video clip, Davidai, who is surrounded by a crowd that’s waving Israeli flags, clamors in a foreign accent for New York Governor Kathy Hochul to send in the National Guard, to confront pro-Palestine and anti-Israel demonstrators, and called for the impeachment of several politicians who he claimed aren’t doing enough to back Israel and its supporters in the United States.

“Mayor Eric Adams, if you can’t do something, we’ll make sure we vote you out or impeach you,” Davidai shouts in the video clip, before moving on to New York Governor Kathy Hochul.

“Kathy Hochul! You have the National Guard! You have terrorists in a university, at New York! That’s your state! Bring in the National Guard!” he shouted, before declaring that “we are going to rid this country of terrorists and terrorist supporters” – apparently by way of military force.

Ironically, at the end of his tirade, Davidai claimed that he supports free speech, but that regardless, he wants the National Guard to combat people he disagrees with and who insult his foreign home nation.

Watch the Video Clip Below: 

A furious Jewish Columbia University Professor @ShaiDavidai with a speech that will be seen by millions of Jewish-Americans and American-Israelis.

He says enough is enough and that Governor @GovKathyHochul must send in the National Guard.

Via @HilzFuld pic.twitter.com/dh3N6oBKj3

— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) April 21, 2024

Related: Hillary Gets Heckled At Columbia University By Anti-War Machine Protesters

LAND GRAB: Israeli ‘Settlers’ Plot Colonization of Gaza Strip

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., will successfully stare down the America First wing of the Republican party by leaning on Democrats to pass the supplemental foreign aid bills.

The bills include a whopping $95 billion in aid to Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan, including some measures to lessen the burden on the American taxpayers to pay these foreign nations, reported The Hill.

Among the chaos, Democrats didn’t believe the GOP would fund the Ukraine effort, to which Johnson compromised, forcefully saying, “Yes!” President Joe Biden supports the series of foreign aid bills that will bury America into further debt and deficit.

The Hill reported that the House will vote on Saturday. The Senate is anticipated to produce one out of the five bills — likely for Ukraine — that will pass the House and onto the president for signing.

Johnson was supposed to be the opposite of “RINO” former Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., but now he appears to be a mirrored image. He has been threatened with a motion to vacate by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green, R-Ga., who is seemingly doing it for her usual antics. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., has also threatened the same, but of course, with a more serious tenor.

The Speaker hasn’t had it all too bad, as former President Donald Trump told him in Mar-a-Lago last week that he “stand[s] with the Speaker.”

According to The Hill, “moderate” Republicans are now praising Johnson for putting his foot down against possible motions to vacate. Ironically, all these “moderates” seem to have the backing of AIPAC — the Israel Lobby.

Alex Conant, formerly of Sen. Marco Rubio’s, R-Fla., 2016 failed presidential campaign, said to The Hill, “You get to a point where you can’t let yourself be held hostage by a fringe wing.”

“The vast majority of Republicans don’t want to surrender Ukraine and support giving our allies what they need,” added the GOP strategist. Note: he never mentions the constituency — only the politicians in the party supporting the foreign aid bills.

The aid that Trump said was a conditional loan to Ukraine is $61 billion. That is a small piece of the total since the original invasion by Russia in February 2022.

According to recent polling, Republicans are more skeptical of providing aid to their European brothers rather than their alleged “Greatest Ally” in the Middle East. Still, aid to Israel is seen as going against Trump’s “America First” nationalism, as public awareness about the failed prolonged entanglements in Iraq and Afghanistan continues to grow.

Ironically, Johnson called himself a “wartime Speaker” during a CNN interview on Wednesday. He told Jake Tapper that the GOP is “going to stand for freedom and make sure Vladimir Putin doesn’t march through Europe.”

In that same interview, he suggested he may change the rules around the motion to vacate, requiring more than a single rep to initiate. Perhaps this is a safeguard to his position. Any rule change, though, would require a majority in the House, which the GOP does not have.

Speaker Mike Johnson claimed on Newsmax that he could not include border funding in the $95 billion supplemental aid package to Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan.

Where do his priorities lie if they don’t with America?pic.twitter.com/6wiJkZRhA2

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) April 19, 2024

Congress Calls for Immediate Vote on $95 Billion Foreign Aid Bill

Still, many Republicans are frustrated by his attempt to separate the aid into different bills, which has essentially killed any chance at border security enactments. One of the Speaker’s five bills includes that, but the Senate is likely to ignore it, reported The Hill.

Matt Walsh: ‘Bow Before Israel (unless you’re an anti-Semite)!’