After more than 200 COVID-19 vaccinations, a German man reportedly showed zero side effects, according to researchers.

The scientific journal The Lancet published the findings this week, showing a 62-year-old man from Magdeburg, Germany, receiving 217 SAR-CoV-2 vaccines within 29 months.

According to The Hill, researchers said the man vaxxed himself outside of the clinical study and against recommendations. The researchers referred to the man’s status as a “hypervaccination,” reportedly showing no side effects but also no significant improvement in his general immune response.

The Hill noted that a public prosecutor was seeking an investigation, claiming fraud, however, no charges were filed. Given his double-hundred vaccination status, the researchers requested the anonymous man to review his immunological response.

The report states that he has not tested positive for COVID-19 since the trial began back in May 2022. The study did find that the man had more T cells than those who had received three vaccinations. This has confused the researchers, who were unable to see the efficacy of the shot. They could not determine whether the initial dosage prevented him from testing positive for COVID-19 or if the surplus of additional shots played a part.

The shots were given to the man between June 2021 and Nov. 2023, according to The Hill. The prosecutor confirmed that a whopping 134 vaccinations were legally administered at the center, while another 83 were self-reported.

The man reportedly received a variation of shots from the mRNA vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech. But, he had also juiced up on Johnson & Johnson along with a Sanofi booster shot.

The Hill noted that the researchers “do not endorse hypervaccination as a strategy to enhance adaptive immunity.”

British Airways Crew Member Dies Suddenly in Front of Passengers

CNN broke the original story and reported that the man was arrested in March 2022 when authorities discovered suspicious vaccination cards being sold and exchanged. He was trying to profit from the lockdowns and the overly tyrannical requirements of proof of vaccinations.

‘Friends’ Actor Matthew Perry Sold Pro-Jab Merchandise Before He Died Suddenly

Mask mandates have returned to New York City’s public health facilities to kick off 2024 as one of the most jabbed cities on earth claims to be experiencing a Covid-19 surge, a full four years removed from the start of the “pandemic” but conveniently less than a year before the next presidential election.

People will be forced to wear a mask to enter the “patient areas” of New York City’s 11 public hospitals and all of the nursing homes and health clinics also run by the New York City Health and Hospital Corporation, a government entity.

The new mask mandate comes as the city not only hypes up fears around Covid but around influenza and “RSV”, a mild respiratory virus that’s received huge publicity in recent years and has been seized upon by governments and their “health” partners to push new “vaccines” and restrict civil liberties.

The return of the mask mandates comes despite even Dr. Fauci having admitted that masks don’t effectively stop the spread of disease and, in many cases, can make people more sick or lead to serious health problems, both physically and psychologically.

Related: Masks Are Useless And Preferred By Less Attractive People, According to Science

The return of mask mandates in New York City comes as several other deep blue locales turn back the clock to 2020 as well, conveniently just 11 months before Americans are set to go to the polls and vote for a new President.

In nearby Massachusetts, the Berkshire Health System has announced a return of its mask mandate, while in Illinois, the state’s Department of Public Health “recommended” last month that mask mandates return to hospitals and other medical facilities. According to local media reports, a multitude of Chicago-based health systems have seized upon the recommendation to bring back mandatory face coverings.

On the other side of the country, New York’s deep blue counterpart of California has also begun bringing back mask mandates in numerous healthcare facilities, and at least one local government, in Yolo County, is “recommending” that citizens mask up every time they leave the house.

COVID-19 vaccine mandates implemented by a handful of major cities across the U.S. hardly made a dent in slowing the spread of the virus, according to a study conducted by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Researchers also explored the negative impact on unvaccinated citizens and businesses.

The study, titled “Indoor Vaccine Mandates in US Cities, Vaccination Behavior, and COVID-19 Outcomes,” examined the effectiveness of vaccine mandates in nine U.S. cities. The list included Boston, New Orleans, Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles and the District of Columbia.

Mandates imposed by the cities were “arguably among the most restrictive and polarizing regulations ever enacted in the United States,” reads the study report. “Most supporters of the regulations claim that the benefits associated with the increase in vaccination rates as a result of the mandate—and its implied reduction in the spread of COVID-19—outweigh the costs of its disruptions. However, the authors find that indoor vaccine mandates had no significant impact on COVID-19 vaccine uptake, cases, or deaths across all nine cities that implemented the policy,” researchers wrote.

The study is only the latest that has yielded results in stark contrast with statements from politicians when enacting the mandates. In one example, Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney stated that implementing vaccine requirements for city workers and indoor masking were ““critical to slowing the spread of the Delta variant of COVID-19.”

Researchers also examined the negative effects on unvaccinated citizens of affected cities, as well as the economic toll on businesses. All told, they concluded that mandates did in fact have a “negative” effect on both.

In one example of negative effects, the study pointed to New York City, where over 90 percent of restaurants reported customer losses. The city’s vaccine mandate also led to staffing shortages in about 75 percent of restaurants. Additionally, 1,430 city workers were fired over refusal to get vaccinated, The Epoch Times reported.

Overall, the study also found that city mandates had minimal effect on overall vaccine uptake.

RELATED: COVID-19 Vaccination Poses Elevated Risk of Myocarditis Death Across All Age Groups, Study Finds

RELATED: NBC Reports On Study Finding Natural Immunity Stronger Than COVID Vaccination

The Executive Committee of the Lee County, Florida Republican Party is invoking the Nuremberg Code in calling on Governor Ron DeSantis to ban the distribution and sale of the COVID-19 bioweapon jab citing the massive levels of death and “vaccine” injuries that have occurred as a result of Big Pharma and the US Government’s orchestrated efforts to forcibly inject the bioweapon into the bodies of all Americans.

The Lee County GOP’s Executive Committee officially passed a “Ban the Jab” resolution, which won the approval of more than two-thirds of the committee’s members, calling on Governor Ron DeSantis to ban the sale and distribution of COVID-19 “vaccine” injections. Colloquially known as the “jab,” the injections, which have been identified as bioweapons, have killed and maimed more people than all other vaccines combined.

In the Ban the Jab resolution, the Lee County GOP writes to Governor DeSantis that “strong and credible evidence exists that COVID-19 and COVID-19 injections are biological and technological weapons.”

Citing Pfizer’s own clinical data, the Lee County GOP adds that the bioweapon jabs have caused “1,223 deaths, 42,000 adverse cases, 158,000 adverse incidents, and approximately 1,000 side effects,” and those are just the numbers that the global Big Pharma giant is admitting to.

“An enormous number of humans have died and or have been permanently disabled,” as a result of the COVID-19 bioweapon jab, the resolution states, adding that “credible evidence exists that Covid mRNA shots alter human DNA,” as was shown in a Swedish study.

According to scientific research into the jab, not only does it act as a bioweapon in altering human DNA, but Pfizer COVID shots even contain “self-assembling microtechnology,” and lead to massive blood clots.

“Government agencies, media and tech companies, and other corporations, have committed enormous fraud by claiming COVID injections are safe and effective,” the resolution goes on, before laying out the numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code committed by Big Pharma and Big Government bioweapon pushers.

“On behalf of the preservation of the human race, the Lee County Republican Party calls upon Governor DeSantis and the state legislature to prohibit the sale and distribution of COVID injections and all mRNA injections in the state of Florida,” the resolution reads. “And for the state Attorney General to immediately seize all COVID injections and mRNA injections in the state of Florida and have a forensic analysis conducted.”

While the resolution does not bind Governor DeSantis to actually take any action to ban and seize the COVID jabs, it does put the ball in his court and will arrive on his desk, awaiting his action.

Authored following World War 2 and named for the Nuremberg Trials that led to the mass execution of genocidal Nazis, the Nuremberg Code is a set of “ethical research principles” that govern “human experimentation” and other crimes of war.

Under the very first line of the Nuremberg Code, a violation related to the forced roll-out of COVID-19 bioweapon jabs is found, as the code reads that “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.” Under the COVID jab mandates enforced by both the government and private sector employers, Americans had no choice but to accept an experimental drug.

Related: Stew Peters Releases ‘Died Suddenly,’ Exposing Death Jab Genocide

Mainstream media outlets are beginning to report on a Lancet study that suggests natural immunity is stronger than COVID-19 vaccination.

NBC News published an article titled ‘Immunity acquired from a Covid infection is as protective as vaccination against severe illness and death, study finds.’

The study, published Thursday, says infection-acquired immunity reduces by 88% the risk of hospitalization and death from COVID-19.

The study was a meta-analysis of over 60 different studies from 19 different countries.

Natural immunity provides “at least as high, if not higher” protection from COVID-19 than two doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

The study’s authors called on public officials to accept that natural immunity is a viable way to protect oneself from COVID-19.

CNN posted a similar article as well.

RELATED: NBA Star Jonathan Isaac Says No To COVID Vaccine Citing Prior Infection, Blasts Rolling Stone For Calling Him Anti-Vaxxer

READ MORE: Pfizer CEO Says Fourth Vaccine Dose is Necessary Due to Waning Immunity

The director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, Dr. Chris Murray touted the study’s analysis. “There’s quite a long sustained protection against severe disease and death, almost 90% at 10 months. It is much better than I had expected, and that’s a good thing for the world, right?”

“It means there’s an awful lot of immunity out there,” he added.

Social media users erupted following the mainstream coverage supportive of natural immunity. “Apparently, NBC News was today years old before they finally figured out what many of us have known for almost three years. Yet people lost their livelihoods and a lot more because our government and public health establishment LIED about natural immunity,” one Twitter user wrote.

Apparently, NBC News was today years old before they finally figured out what many of us have known for almost three years. Yet people lost their livelihoods and a lot more because our government and public health establishment LIED about natural immunity. pic.twitter.com/0I6PBxYlFc

— Rob Jenkins (@profontheright) February 17, 2023

“Oh New study found? More like what people were saying during 2020 that was labeled as misinformation by the big tech Oligarchs,” one user replied to the CNN article tweet.

https://twitter.com/Ebomblive/status/1626450483362557952?s=20

Stay tuned to National File for any updates.

RELATED: NBA Star Jonathan Isaac Says No To COVID Vaccine Citing Prior Infection, Blasts Rolling Stone For Calling Him Anti-Vaxxer

READ MORE: Pfizer CEO Says Fourth Vaccine Dose is Necessary Due to Waning Immunity

The Associated Press (AP) seemingly attempted to mislead the public by insinuating that the COVID-19 pandemic, instead of tyrannical lockdowns, is to blame for the increase in depression among teenagers.

Recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) clearly shows the devastating impact of lockdowns on the mental health of U.S. teenagers.

The CDC study details represent that almost 60% of U.S. teen girls reported feelings of “persistent sadness or hopelessness,” as direct result of tyrannical lockdowns. This finding supports earlier released data and emphasizes the severe impact that tyrannical lockdowns have mental health, particularly in young people.

The recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention highlights a concerning trend in the mental health of U.S. teens. The data shows that tyrannical lockdowns, imposed as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, have had a devastating impact on the mental health of this population. This is particularly alarming as the mental health of teens is crucial for their development and overall well-being.

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about major changes in our daily lives, including the loss of social connections, increased stress and uncertainty, and reduced physical activity. For teens, these changes have been especially difficult, as they rely on social interaction, physical activity, and a sense of routine for their mental health and well-being. The tyrannical lockdowns, which have forced many teens to spend extended periods of time at home, have only compounded these challenges.

This is a clear indication that the tyrannical lockdowns have taken a toll on the mental health of the entire US population.

The CDC report further showed that sexual violence, suicidal thoughts, suicidal behavior, and other mental health problems affected many teens. Girls and LGBTQ youth were reporting even higher levels of depression and suicidal ideation. 30% of girls specifically reported that they had considered attempting suicide

Kathleen Ethier, the director of CDC’s adolescent and school health division, stated that in her 30 years of collecting similar data, “we’ve never seen this kind of devastating, consistent findings.” She added that “there’s no question young people are telling us they are in crisis. The data really call on us to act.”

RELATED: Lockdowns Led To Biggest Performance Drop in History of U.S. Educational Testing 

RELATED: New Orleans Restaurant Will Receive Damages for Lockdown-Related Revenue Loss 

The U.S. federal government is tracking people who decided not to get the COVID-19 vaccine injection, according to bombshell federal government records and video exclusively obtained by NATIONAL FILE. According to the shocking video, unvaccinated people are quietly tracked when they go to the doctor’s office or to the hospital due to a quiet new program proposed and implemented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Government meeting materials make clear that the new program is designed to “track people who are not immunized or only partially immunized.”

A bombshell piece of information was revealed at the September 14-15, 2021 virtual Zoom meeting of the federal government’s ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee (which includes representatives from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, known as CMS, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Center for Health Statistics). At the meeting, the Committee discussed new categories of “ICD-10” codes that the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) wanted to create to mark people as “Unvaccinated for COVID-19,” “Partially Vaccinated for COVID-19” and “Other underimmunization status.”

The ICD-10 coding system was created by the World Health Organization (WHO) and doctors are required to use it to categorize different kinds of patients. The ICD-10 codes are preserved in a patient’s electronic health record and used by insurance companies for billing purposes. The CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics maintains the ICD-10 codes. Within ICD-10 codes, there is a category known as “ICD-10-CM” codes (which are reportedly used by the CDC for tracking purposes), and this “CM” category includes the new “Unvaccinated for COVID-19” category and also the “Partially Vaccinated For COVID-19” category and the “other underimmunization status” category.

The Committee made it clear that the new codes would be used to “track” unvaccinated people. At the time of the meeting, people who had adverse reactions to a past vaccine would still be categorized as unvaccinated or partially vaccinated, even if they are physically unable to get more vaccines or boosters.

The CDC implemented the new codes to track unvaccinated people in April 2022, according to a document published on a CMS federal government website. 

ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Commitee staffer David Berglund, M.D. read from page 194 of a CDC Topic Packet that was prepared for the meeting (READ THE CDC TOPIC PACKET HERE).

The Topic Packet states (emphasis added): “During the current time of the COVID-19 pandemic, immunizations have provided protection for many people, but there is interest in being able to track people who are not immunized or only partially immunized. At the current time, this is a significant modifiable risk factor for morbidity and mortality, and of interest for clinical reasons, as well as of value for public health. NCHS is proposing creation of codes for unvaccinated for COVID-19, and for partially vaccinated for COVID-19.”

“NCHS” stands for the National Center for Health Statistics, which is a U.S. federal government division of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Here is footage from the meeting in which David Berglund discusses the new codes. NATIONAL FILE obtained this video from a password-protected government website.

CDC Plot To Track The Unvaccinated Revealed At September 2021 ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee Meeting pic.twitter.com/0E5AaCmDAm

— National File (@NationalFile) February 1, 2023

Berglund stated, “Those are their proposed changes,” referring to the CDC’s NCHS division.

Here is page 194 of the Topic Packet for the meeting, which refers to “interest in being able to track people who are not immunized or only partially immunized.”

screenshot from the virtual meeting showing the meeting packet

A commenter from Premier asked about patients who “may have had their first shot, had a really bad adverse reaction, and can’t get the second shot. Should there maybe be a code that indicates incomplete vaccination or unvaccinated due to contraindication?”

David Berglund replied, “Hmm. So that would essentially be, that could be “partially vaccinated,” or, well, in some cases people might be completely unvaccinated if they’ve had some history of a reaction to some types of vaccines. But essentially the thought would be that there would be a history of other reaction type code that would explain it. I’d have to look at how that might be done. We have not, at this point, proposed to have a separate way of coding that type of situation here. But there certainly could be interest in that. We can certainly look at that further.”

An NIH government website states: “ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes will tell the story of each patient encounter, describe etiologies of the disease process, explain the complications of care, provide a basis for medical necessity, support coverage for payment purposes, identify incidence of disease, and support statistical tracking for healthcare practices, as well as provide disease state information on medical practices across the continuum of care.”

RELATED: Twitter Files: Pfizer Board Member Flagged Tweets Questioning COVID Vaccine 

RELATED: Leaked Emails Suggest CDC Coordinated With Twitter, Facebook And Google To Censor Social Media Users

Patrick Howley’s influential April 2020 investigative report “Fauci’s NIAID Funded Wuhan Lab Scientists To Research Bat Coronavirus” has become a key document in the public discourse following statements by President Donald Trump, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and others that COVID-19 initially leaked out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where Fauci was funding the dangerous coronavirus research.

As people die suddenly after taking the Coronavirus injection, the Truth movement is waking up the human population to the sinister agenda of the globalist elites, including the vaccine-pushing relationship between Fauci and oligarch Bill Gates, which NATIONAL FILE has extensively documented.

Robert F. Kennedy Junior has led the way in waking people up to the well-documented dangers of vaccines and the perfidy of the Big Pharma oligarchs pushing the needles upon a demoralized and disenfranchised public. Kennedy Junior began working on vaccine Truth many years ago, before the Coronavirus scamdemic further burnished his credentials as a Truth-teller with substance and bravery.

Patrick Howley’s reporting for NATIONAL FILE is featured at the 4:44 mark in the trailer for The Real Anthony Fauci: The Movie, featured below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3eQSet-3hA

A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against a California law that allows the Medical Board of California to punish medical personnel who spread “misinformation” or have opinions on COVID-19 that goes against “consensus.”

The law, formally known as Assembly Bill 2098, was set to take effect at the start of this year. Under the law, the Medical Board of California and the Osteopathic Medical Board of California could discipline physicians who “disseminate” information about COVID that is not in line with the “contemporary scientific consensus,” Fox News reported.

The law has faced significant backlash from civil liberties advocates and physicians who point to the numerous instances where “consensus” opinion on COVID-19 policy was wrong. In November, a group of five California physicians filed a lawsuit against California Governor Gavin Newsom’s Administration, arguing that the law violates their first amendment rights, as well as their right to due process.

Aaron Kheriaty, MD, one of the doctors listed in the lawsuit, shared in a tweet Wednesday that a judge had granted a preliminary injunction against Assembly Bill 2098.

“The ruling bodes well for our case,” Kheriaty tweeted. “It indicates that our arguments that this law is unconstitutional have strong pre-trial facial plausibility. Not to get ahead of ourselves, of course, or try to predict the final outcome of the case, but this is a very positive development.

“One more detail here,” he added. “The preliminary injunction ruling also establishes that we five physicians have standing to challenge the law. This is important because a similar challenge filed against AB2098 was dismissed based on a ruling that the plaintiffs lacked standing.”

2/ The ruling bodes well for our case: it indicates that our arguments that this law is unconstitutional have strong pre-trial facial plausibility. Not to get ahead of ourselves, of course, or try to predict the final outcome of the case, but this is a very positive development.

— Aaron Kheriaty (@AaronKheriatyMD) January 26, 2023

The doctors are being represented by The New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), a nonpartisan civil rights firm.

Jenin Younes, counsel for the NCLA, said in November that it is “shocking” that such a law could be enacted in the United States. “That this shocking bill passed through the state legislature and was signed into law by Governor Newsom demonstrates that far too many Americans do not understand the First Amendment,” Younes said.

The doctors named in the complaint argued that the law violates their First Amendment rights because it impedes their ability to communicate with patients. “In safeguarding Americans’ rights to free speech and expression, the First Amendment applies not only to expression of majority opinions, but to minority views as well,” the complaint said.

They have also argued against the concept of a “consensus” an  issue such as COVID-19, where top health officials in the federal government routinely changed guidelines based on emerging data. Doctors argued that “contemporary scientific consensus” is “undefined in the law and undefinable as a matter of logic.”

RELATED: British Columbia Advances Law That Will Jail Doctors for ‘Misinformation’

RELATED: Biden’s Disinformation Czar Says ‘Liberal Voices’ Are More Likely to be Censored 

A prominent cartoonist and political influencer has changed his narrative on COVID-19 vaccinations.

Scott Adams, the creator of the “Dilbert” comic strip, said in a youtube video Saturday that COVID vaccine skeptics “appear to be right.”

Adams recognized the non-vaccinated’s natural immunity as a viable protection against COVID-19. “Somebody who did not get vaccinated, got a little ‘omicron’ or maybe even a worse [strain] but recovered, now you’ve got natural immunity, can we all agree that that was the winning path,” Adams encouraged.

“I want you to hear that clearly: the anti-vax people appear to be the winners. The anti-vaxxers clearly are the winners at this point, and I think it’ll probably stay that way. And I don’t want to put any shade on that whatsoever. They came out the best. They have the winning position. The unvaccinated have a current advantage, because they feel better.”

Adams said unvaccinated don’t need to worry about “what I have to worry about, which is, ‘I wonder if that vaccination, five years from now…'” he began saying before abruptly pausing.

The Dilbert creator cited distrust in the government and “big companies” as the driving force between COVID-19 vaccine skeptics’ decisions. “So, if you just took the position, ‘let’s just distrust everything the government did,’ you won!” he said.

https://twitter.com/healthbyjames/status/1617200070130294786?s=20&t=0qooVyXQFyuCPPBNxi4Vvg

On a Twitter post advertising his video, Adams said bluntly, “The anti-vaxxers won. I lost.”

The anti-vaxxers won. I lost. Episode 1995 EXCERPT – AntiVaxxers Win https://t.co/5LDNeZ4sbv via @YouTube

— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) January 21, 2023

One Twitter user, Andy Swan, criticized Adams for referring to COVID-19 vaccine skeptics of being “antivaxxers.”

“The fact that @ScottAdamsSay still refers to us as “antivaxxers” — despite knowing that the vast majority of us support actual vaccines and had no hesitation in giving our children actual vaccines — indicates that he is still caught in the propaganda vortex. Sad.”

Stay tuned to National File for any updates.

RELATED: DOJ Accuses Utah Surgeon Of Giving Fake COVID-19 Vaccines to Children, Selling Vaccine Cards

READ MORE: Twitter Files: Pfizer Board Member Flagged Tweets Questioning COVID Vaccine