Owner of X, Elon Musk, announced on X that USMC veteran and prominent influencer Lucas Gage was suspended after “repeated and clear calls for violence.”

The Tuesday post on X comes on the heels of the seven or more times Gage has been swatted in the past week. The veteran maintains his innocence against clear libel from the richest man in the world, Musk.

Musk provided a follow-up to the inquiry from the account “1984,” replying with a screenshotted post from Gage that he says “triggered the 6-month suspension.”

X-users swarmed to the defense of Gage, showing screenshot after screenshot of abuse from Zionists who have largely remained unpunished for their calls to violence or the removal of people from their lands.

Many more posts demonstrate the Zionists’ abuse and call to violence, in particular. Here is one from outspoken Zionist Jew Dr. Eli David, co-founder of Tel Aviv’s Deep Instinct cybersecurity.

Both posts on X by Musk were easily ratioed, proving “Vox Populi, Vox Dei.” The people have spoken and are largely against Gage’s suspension. A poll by former US senatorial candidate Sam Parker demonstrates this further.

This may not mean much to Musk, although he has repeatedly stated that the decisions of the X platform are ultimately left up to the people — Vox Populi, Vox Dei.

Musk, after being coerced to visit the Auschwitz Concentration Camp with The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro, has certainly changed his tone and approach. He completely stopped talking about the abusive power of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). This Jewish organization attempted to destroy the X platform after Musk’s purchase with several advertiser boycotts.

It is almost as if Musk has now taken a priority stance for the Jewish demographic. It may seem that way because of the Oct. 7 attack against Israel, or perhaps it is all just out of fear.

Whether Gage’s 6-month suspension is justified is unknown. X’s policies on violence may appear straightforward, but its implementation is another story. There has been a clear shift in the so-called “free-speech platform” X, almost as if it is now engaged in the same DEI and special interest nonsense that Musk once railed against.

X’s internal AI, Grok, offered this perspective that “context matters” and that “burning a book or flag [is] not always a free speech free-for-all.” However, it states that “burning the American flag” is “protected under the First Amendment.” So, the assumption is a flag of a foreign country, Israel, is not, at least according to X. Grok also said, “burning a book … in a way that’s intended to intimate or threaten others … could be … a hate crime…”

At this point, it all seems too obvious. To X, burning the Israeli flag is intimidation, but not when you burn the US flag. As far as burning the Talmud, a Jewish text stating Jesus Christ is boiling in a vat of excrement, is considered not okay and threatening to Jews.

EXCLUSIVE: Harassment Campaign Heightens Against Outspoken USMC Veteran

The priorities of X have aligned with the rest of the so-called “establishment” to simply maintain the ordered hierarchy that is so evident in Western societies. Lucas Gage is one of the few who outwardly threaten that status quo; thus, he faces tremendous reprisals.

Lucas Gage: Look Toward Counter Cancel Culture Industry

Kentucky Republican Rep. Thomas Massie introduced a bill today to end the Biden Administration’s endless cashflow for developing Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools for so-called “disinformation.”

The mere 83-word bill, H.R. 8519, lays out the House Republicans’ plan to defund the federal government’s online censorship research:

A BILL

To prohibit the obligation or expenditure of Federal funds for disinformation research grants, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

No Federal funds may be obligated or expended by any Federal department or agency for the following:

(1) Disinformation research grants.

(2) Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace grants.

(3) Programs within the National Science Foundation’s Track F: Trust and Authenticity in Communications Systems.

The aforementioned NSF’s Track F program was identified as a threat to online free speech in a report by the House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government in February 2024.

“As the distributor of multi-million-dollar grants, the National Science Foundation (NSF) is a key player in the ‘censorship industrial complex” acting “under the guise of combatting so-called misinformation,” read the report. “NSF has been funding AI-driven tools and other new technologies that can be used to censor or propagandize online speech.”

The ADL Gears Up for More Censorship with ‘White Supremacist’ Report

“In March 2021, NSF introduced Track F: Trust & Authenticity in CommunicationSystems, allocating $21 million to the program. For Track F, NSF solicited proposals to address the manipulation or ‘unanticipated negative effects’ of communication systems—a departure from the Convergence Accelerator program’s other, more concrete research topics.

“The euphemistic ‘trust and authenticity in communication systems,’ in fact, means combatting so-called ‘misinformation,’ i.e., censorship. In an early draft solicitation, NSF indicated that Track F projects will ‘address issues of trust and authenticity in communication systems, including predicting, preventing, detecting, correcting, and mitigating the spread of inaccurate information that harms people and society.’ As NSF’s Track F program manager, Michael Pozmantier, explained more plainly in a June 2021 email, Track F isthe NSF ‘Accelerator track focused on combatting mis/disinformation.’”

WordPress’s WooPayments Stripped from War Veteran’s Bookstore

According to the Media Research Center, taxpayer-funded grants have been used to research and develop AI tools to monitor 750,000 blogs and media articles daily while mining data from social media platforms. The MRC said some of the stated reasons for such research are to lessen the responsibility of corporate tech platforms, “externalize” censorship, aid in adding needed or “true” context and action to enforce against misinformation.

President Trump Extends Golf Club Invitation to Loudon County Parents And Students Amid School Board Censorship: “SAVE THE STUDENTS!!!”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Cabinet, on a unanimous vote on Sunday, decided to close down the Al Jazeera broadcast station in Israel.

According to The Hill, Netanyahu said, “The government headed by me unanimously decided: the incitement channel Al Jazeera will be closed in Israel.”

הממשלה בראשותי החליטה פה אחד: ערוץ ההסתה אל ג׳זירה ייסגר בישראל.

תודה לשר @shlomo_karhi

— Benjamin Netanyahu – בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) May 5, 2024

Al Jazeera responded by denying the accusation, reported The Associated Press, although the outlet based in Qatar stands as really the last beacon of a non-Zionist perspective.

The AP also noted that the English broadcast is similar to major networks, but its Arabic version allegedly publishes straight verbatim from Hamas and other Islamic militant groups. However, that claim has not been sourced by the AP or backed up.

Al Jazeera posted a statement on X, stating Netanyahu’s Cabinet move was “banning media service providers from transmitting its broadcasts and blocking Al Jazeera Media Network websites.” It also remarked that this comes on World Press Freedom Day, calling the move a “criminal act that violates human rights and the basic right to access to information.”

Al Jazeera then accuses Israel of the “killing of journalists” and “arrests” during the war on Gaza. It finally stated that it would pursue all legal avenues and that “Targeting journalists is a crime.”

"If you’re watching this… then Al Jazeera has been banned in Israel."

Al Jazeera's @ajimran recorded his last report from occupied East Jerusalem, pre-empting the Netanyahu gov't’s unanimous decision to close Al Jazeera in Israel pic.twitter.com/ZOzqxpSKGJ

— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) May 5, 2024

The Hill admits that the effects of Netayanhu’s cabinet are not so evident. However, the AP reported that Al Jazeera broadcasted how the effects would weigh on its operations in Israel.

One correspondent said it would not affect the coverage of the Palestinian territories. Another said the order blocked the channel from “holding offices or operating them” in Israel and that the website would ultimately blocked in Israel. Senior political analyst for Al Jazeera, Marwan Bishara, said this move proves that Israel “is not a democratic state.”

House Passes Antisemitism Hate Speech Bill Curbing Free Speech

The decision by Netanyhu’s cabinet to censor an adversarial press comes on the heels of cease-fire talk, which, ironically, Qatar is trying to broker between Israel and Hamas. One can imagine that Israel seems unwilling to talk after censoring Al Jazeera.

Long Island Rep. D’Esposito’s New Bill Criminalizes Anti-Zionism Through IHRA’s ‘Working Definition’

After several years of being banned from the so-called “free speech” platform, conservative commentator Nicholas J. Fuentes is now reinstated on X.

Musk said in a post on Thursday that Fuentes would be reinstated but would “be crushed by the comments and Community Notes.” It seems Musk wants to make an example of Fuentes. Still, it is very unlikely he will since the paleoconservative has garnered a massive America First audience, including his personal crowd referred to as the defamed “groypers.”

Very interesting timing for Elon Musk to reinstate Nick Fuentes. Could there be more to this after the House passed the hate speech bill?

Courtesy to @goyabeangroyper and the other groypers for grabbing Musk’s attention. https://t.co/1vSci7qw5j

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) May 2, 2024

The conservative commentator was originally banned in July 2021 from Twitter. He was reinstated, then banned again on January 25, 2023. With Fuentes’s return on Friday, he rattled the boots of Zionists and the pro-Israel lobby — even the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) made a statement about his return to X.

We are concerned that white supremacist influencer Nick Fuentes may be officially welcomed back on X.

While ADL recognizes the right to free speech, we must also sound the alarm on hate and antisemitism in all its forms. Learn more about Fuentes here: https://t.co/W2FdzUwwWD

— ADL (@ADL) May 3, 2024

The thing to remember is that we currently have Republicans siding with the Anti-Defamation League to garner support for anti-free speech laws alleged to protect Jews. In reality, many of these laws, coordinated by Israeli dual-citizens and associated NGOs, suppress the speech of Christians. Not only is free speech an issue, but the ADL directly targets Whites and Christians. Most conservatives know and understand this, yet Republicans are working in conjunction with them.

Thank you @elonmusk for reinstating my account and upholding your commitment to free speech.

I have been censored on every major platform for +3 years. Much has been said about me in that time by groups like ADL and SPLC…

I look forward to reintroducing myself in my own words!

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) May 4, 2024

Fuentes thanked Elon Musk for reinstating his account on X, saying he is “upholding your commitment to free speech.” He also notes the two primary characters involved in his defamation and deplatforming — the ADL and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). The two NGOs encroach on free speech and push for deplatforming.

Fuentes’s commentary is typically viewed as dissident right. He identifies as Roman Catholic first, then a paleoconservative and a nationalist. Fuentes, like many paleocons, has been disgusted and critical of foreign lobbyists asserting influence over American politicians. He typically calls them out, which is a practice that is considered “unsuitable” in media. You cannot discuss the Israel Lobby, Israel negatively, or anything involving Jewish people.

The Rеpublican party is not our party, thеy arе controllеd by Isrаеl.

-Nick Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) pic.twitter.com/IqmjfPRfMd

— socksgrypr (@scksgrypr) May 4, 2024

Fuentes’ return has garnered him much support or perhaps curiosity. At 10 pm on Friday, he had 91.9k followers; now he has 229k. His account will continue to grow as people are generally curious about his ideology and commentary.

Again, as mentioned before, he discusses topics considered “off-limits” in mainstream media, but these conversations are a must-have. Even if you disagree with the man, it’s important to understand where the opposition is coming from. It is also safe to say that the movement that supports Fuentes — America First — is rapidly growing and slowly becoming mainstream, according to The Hill.

Across the aisle, politicians resolved their conflicts for $95 billion in foreign aid, excluding funding for the southern border.

For "America First," NGOs must be held under the lens of the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA).

Read more @PaleoconPubhttps://t.co/ZHZX0eTV4b

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) April 28, 2024

With Fuentes now on X, America First seems inevitable. Predictably, the ADL and SPLC will continue to defame and attack Fuentes, but their words are meaningless to a public that has little to no respect for these NGOs, according to various outlets.

The real question is how fast America First has spread now that all its primary characters are in the public square. How will neoconservatives and Zionists respond, and will they attempt to get him banned or defamed like the aforementioned NGOs?

7 years ago, I was cancelled by @benshapiro at age 18 because I said he puts Israel first instead of America.

5 years ago, I was cancelled by @charliekirk11 because I questioned his support for mass migration, gay pride, and the Israel Lobby.

Now everyone sees that I was right.

— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) May 4, 2024

There are a lot of inquiries to be made, but the big win, regardless of whether you agree with Fuentes, is that Musk seems to be in control on his own for once. There are now Jewish elders and Ben Shapiro courting him to the Auschwitz concentration camp. No NGOs are fueling the feed, as Musk is simply ignoring them. This controversial move can be seen in several different lights.

The Daily Wire Confirms Israel First Position

Is Musk bored of the Con Inc. crowd? Is he trying to avoid the fact that he actively promotes certain accounts? Is he trying to make an example of Fuentes? Or is he simply trying to restore free speech, as he claimed was his primary mission?

House Passes Antisemitism Hate Speech Bill Curbing Free Speech

Whatever the reason, Nick Fuentes now retains a voice in the public square and will have considerable influence on political discourse.

Long Island Rep. D’Esposito’s New Bill Criminalizes Anti-Zionism Through IHRA’s ‘Working Definition’

After a turbulent six-month standoff on whether or not Ukraine would receive additional aid and how much taxpayer money would go to Israel, President Joe Biden signed the supplemental foreign aid package on Wednesday in addition to legislation forcing ByteDance to sell TikTok.

The aid to Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan, amounting to $95 billion, was passed in the House on Saturday, while it was passed just this Tuesday in the Senate. The President sounded off, saying:

The path to my desk was a difficult path. It should have been easier and it should’ve gotten there sooner. But in the end we did what America always does, we rose to the moment.

According to CNBC, Biden had announced his plans to sign the bills after the House passed them on Saturday. The Senate, then on Tuesday, remarkably passed the package with bipartisan support with a vote of 79-18, including 29 Republicans voting in the affirmative.

The grand foreign investment includes $61 billion to Ukraine, $26 billion to Israel and $8 billion to Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific. CNBC reported that the package also requires ByteDance to sell its popular social media platform, TikTok, within nine months or after Biden decides to provide a 90-day extension. If the Chinese company fails to do so, TikTok will face a nationwide ban.

TikTok Policy responded on X to the demands as “unconstitutional” and would “challenge it in court.”

The fact is, we have invested billions of dollars to keep U.S. data safe and our platform free from outside influence and manipulation. This ban would devastate seven million businesses and silence 170 million Americans.

Our Statement on Enactment of the TikTok Ban:

This unconstitutional law is a TikTok ban, and we will challenge it in court. We believe the facts and the law are clearly on our side, and we will ultimately prevail. The fact is, we have invested billions of dollars to keep U.S.…

— TikTok Policy (@TikTokPolicy) April 24, 2024

TikTok has remained the sole platform for the proliferation of pro-Palestine content. Many Zionist commentators have remarked along that tone, pushing for the ban, while free-speech conservatives have pushed back. Jewish Zionist NGOs have had heavy footing on the other social media platforms, which is believed to be why the US government has been so stringent on TikTok.

Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-NE) comes right out and admits it: they're about to ban TikTok because "young people are getting their news" from the app, and "pro-Palestinian" hashtags generate lots of views. He says Chinese Communists are "pushing this racist agenda" to undermine America pic.twitter.com/ahcRcnXXfU

— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) April 23, 2024

Recall that only a few months ago, during the #BanTheADL campaign on X targeting the Anti-Defamation League’s censorship brigade, Elon Musk met with several Jewish leaders and Ben Shapiro to reevaluate the platform. Musk ended up visiting the Auschwitz Concentration Camp at the behest of the leaders, and now the platform has seen unprecedented censorship and boosting of Zionist content.

The only true free speech platform is and has been for quite sometime is Andrew Torba’s Gab, which is banned on all major provider stores, including Apple and Android. Gab has been labeled all sorts of things, ironically, by the Jewish NGOs that embrace censorship.

29 GOP Senators Vote to Approve Supplemental Foreign Aid Package

The ultimate takeaway is that America is back to being the global police with a massive and questionably justifiable payout to several foreign nations. Add to it, now Gen Z’s favored social media platform is likely to face a national ban.

Speaker Johnson Ignores Border to Pass Supplemental Foreign Aid Bill

Meta’s Instagram is finally taking steps to minimize the unadulterated content sent to teens via its direct messaging system. Users under 18 will automatically see blurred images that contain nudity, Instagram announced Thursday just ahead of the upcoming presidential elections.

The company also encourages adult users to turn on the feature, reported The Hill. The initiative is intended to protect users from potential “sextortion” scammers, according to Instagram’s blog post. But still, the public doesn’t know how far of a reach this will extend, particularly in the political realm.

The update comes after Meta and other social media platforms faced pressure to put restrictions in place to protect teens who frequently used the platforms.

Sextortion scams entail persuading a person into sending explicit photos and then threatening them to make the photos public unless payment or favors are granted. It ranks among the highest concerns for parents on social media. Big Tech hopes to clamp down unironically right in time for the presidential elections.

With the new update, nude photos will be blurred under a warning screen that states that the “photo may contain nudity” before the user decides to view it or not. According to The Hill, Instagram will also send users messages telling them “don’t feel pressured to respond,” with the option to block and/or report. Any user who tries to forward an explicit image will receive a message that urges them to reconsider.

After the Senate panel hearing in January over the risks these platforms pose to teens, Big Tech is feeling the pressure to crack down. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, along with the CEOs of Discord, Snap, X and TikTok, faced scrutiny from the panel and will probably amp up on such initiatives and possibly censorship.

The Hill reported that the House Energy and Commerce Committee is holding a hearing on Wednesday focusing on a group of bills aimed at protecting children online. The hearing will also include the unveiling of the comprehensive data privacy bill. Whether these bills overlap in some form with suppression or censorship is unknown, but it wouldn’t be too surprising.

With bipartisan support, the Senate Commerce Committee is expected to push forward these bills, reported The Hill. However, none have yet to be called to a floor vote.

The concern comes as support for Israel continues to plummet while establishment politicians scramble for the foreign lobby’s defense. There is also the upcoming presidential election. These bills may springboard a political defensive as Meta and Twitter did in the past with the Hunter Biden laptop story.

The ADL Gears Up for More Censorship with ‘White Supremacist’ Report

If Republicans keep an eye on America rather than Israel, they could spot the holes in these bills and also prep for the much-expected counteroffensive Democrat-backed platforms, such as Meta, will take.

Corporate Media Targets Social Media Amid Falling Support for Israel

The Anti-Defamation League, prepping for an incoming wave of censorship, released a report claiming that 2023 was the second year in a row to have a record high of “white supremacist propaganda incidents.”

The Jewish nonprofit said there was a 12% increase in incidents, totaling 7,567, up from 6,746. It also reported there was a rise in antisemitic propaganda to 1,112 from last year’s 852 claimed incidents.

Note that the ADL abides by the IHRA working definition of antisemitism, which includes anti-Zionist or anti-Israel sentiments. The NGO defined antisemitic propaganda as “language or symbols, targeted [at] Jewish institutions or both.” The ADL believes the surge in antisemitism to be attributed to the Oct. 7 Hamas attack but not Israel’s genocidal response.

ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said in the report, “When conflict erupts in Israel, antisemitic incidents soon follow in the U.S. and globally.” He curiously doesn’t explain why that is, though.

“Anti-LGBTQ+ propaganda” saw a 141% increase, from 68 to 164, of which the ADL attributes all of that to “white supremacists.”

What is an "Easter worshiper," Amy Cassidy (@amy_cassidy1) and Sarah Dean (@SarahHDean)?

Why not just write "Christians"? We do not worship Easter. You two would never dare do this to any other religious group — so why Christians and on Good Friday? pic.twitter.com/RMbKiS1R5a

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) March 29, 2024

The Jewish nonprofit mentions that it tracks hate against all peoples except Whites and Christians:

This annual assessment is just one dataset that helps to quantify the hate marginalized communities, especially those who are Jewish, LGBTQ+, Black, or immigrants, face on a daily basis.

Virginia and Texas reportedly saw the highest amount of White supremacist propaganda incidents last year. New York, California, Massachusetts, Missouri, Tennesse, Michigan, North Carolina and Maryland follow, according to the ADL’s Center on Extremism (COE).

The ADL defines White supremacist propaganda incidents as “the distribution of racist, antisemitic and anti-LGBTQ+ fliers, stickers, banners, graffiti, posters and laser projections.” That is a bit odd, given any race can believe and act out in those manners, but the ADL prefaces it as a White issue:

Propaganda campaigns are hugely popular among white supremacist groups and movements because they provoke media and online attention for the groups and messaging while limiting the risk of individual exposure, arrests and public backlash that often accompany more public activities.

The ADL claims that “Propaganda, which can affect entire communities, allows a small number of people to have an outsized impact,” reported The Hill.

Elon Musk claims he doesn't believe in censorship, yet one young man, Nick Fuentes, is censored into oblivion by X.

From @NickJFuentes to @autumngroyper and now @freeblexit — all accounts are banned. Dissidents aren't afforded a voice on Musk's so-called "free speech" platform. https://t.co/Ha29JPHBHQ pic.twitter.com/6pz7z9s4cA

— Brian J. Pfail (@brian_pfail) March 29, 2024

As what a bystander can tell from this, there is a massive problem with dissent against the establishment. This report comes on the heels of The Daily Wire firing Candace Owens for alleged antisemitism. It also comes only three days after the banning of America First commentator Nick Fuentes’ third X account.

Candace Owens Takes Aim at the Jewish Lobby

Such reports by the ADL and other NGOs are meant to alert and instill fear, which typically leads to suppression and censorship of speech. More releases are expected as dissident accounts make their marks, and Con Inc. continues to scramble to remain relevant and truthful.

Germany Vows to Protect Jews, Adding Judaism, Holocaust and Israel to Citizenship Exam

A Republican State Representative in Michigan was stripped of his committee assignment and staff on Monday after acknowledging the migrant crisis’ effect on American demographics.

State Rep. Josh Schriver (R-Oxford) quote-posted a map of the world with White people becoming the minority, along with the phrase, “The great replacement!” The original post came from the Senior Editor at Human Events, Jack Posobeic.

https://t.co/vAmscRZxVc

— Rep. Josh Schriver (@JoshuaSchriver) February 6, 2024

House Speaker Joe Tate, a disgruntled black Detroit Democrat, said in a statement:

I will not allow the Michigan House of Representatives to be a forum for the proliferation of racist, hateful and bigoted speech. … The House of Representatives is the people’s house, and all Michiganders should look upon this body and take price in how we conduct ourselves. It is also a workplace, and I have a responsibility to make sure the employees of the House feel safe and secure.

The Michigan House of Representatives is the people's house. We will not allow it to be a forum for the proliferation of bigoted speech. https://t.co/0NvwsxPYBn

— Joe Tate (@SpeakerJoeTate) February 12, 2024

Celebrator of “Black History Month” state Rep. Tate told outlets that Schriver, a fierce Christian, had “a history of promoting debunked theories and dangerous rhetoric.” He also mentioned speaking out against Schriver’s free speech on social media.

President Trump, Tucker Carlson, and Elon Musk (@elonmusk) have all been attacked for tweeting about what's called the great replacement theory. Now I'm attacked for simply reading/retweeting a tweet by @JackPosobiec on the same topic.

There is an anti-white agenda for sure.…

— Rep. Josh Schriver (@JoshuaSchriver) February 9, 2024

According to Fox2Detroit, Schriver reposted the controversial Tweet on Feb. 6, and it appears he has not taken it down. He even added a rebuttal to the false assertions.

It really doesn’t matter if he removes the post, as Fox reported Tate plans to remove Schriver from the House Natural Resources, Environment, Tourism, and Outdoor Recreation Committee. The House Business Office will also withhold the lawmaker’s resources.

Schriver will still be allowed to vote in the House. However, it remains unclear how the post is “racist” or “bigoted” since chain migration has led to clear demographic changes in Western nations, according to the Migration Policy Institute (MPI).

Many of the media outlets reporting on this so-called scandal have referenced the Southern Poverty Law Center. The local affiliate network reported that “the great replacement” is “a racist conspiracy narrative that falsely asserts there is an active and covert effort to replace white populations in current white-majority countries.”

The SPLC has condemned and connected “the great replacement” to many former Trump advisors, Tucker Carlson, former President Calvin Coolidge, White Christians and several immigration monitoring NGOs. The Southern Poverty Law Center puts all of these individuals and organizations as aligned with White mass shooters and Nazi ideology. The nonprofit also claims this “modern racist conspiracy” to have “European roots.”

The concept of “the great replacement” is evidenced by the aforementioned statistics and does not rely on National Socialism or identitarianism. The stigmatization of fact has become enumerably abundant in today’s liberalism. A fine example is any critique of crime stats.

Democrats Use Migrant Crisis to Urbanize Long Island, Change Demographics

Such “cancel culture” is a means to eliminate discussion of the true problems facing the nation. And it appears to be very effective, even on the Right.

President Trump on Illegal Immigrants: ‘We Don’t Want Them’

Big Tech is at it again, setting its sights on the 2024 presidential election. Meta’s Facebook posted a job listing on LinkedIn for “voting rights & elections,” granting a reasonable suspicion after social media platforms censored the Hunter Biden laptop story just before the 2020 election.

The job description details a position under Meta’s Civil Rights Team with an expected “expertise in voting rights, elections, and democracy issues.”

The scope of the job will include research, analysis and communication strategy overseen by Roy Austin, VP and Deputy GC, CR, and Legal Manager, according to the original post on LinkedIn.

The listing goes on to detail Meta’s Civil Rights Team. It will act to “intersect with company policies and practices” to “address threats to voting rights, elections, and civic participation, primarily in the United States.” This would entail “research and analysis … of voting laws and civic participation, impacts of voter suppression and intimidation, particularly on historically marginalized communities, and current threats to elections and well-functioning democracy …”

Meta lists some examples of job duties, including:

• Summarizing and communicating developments in voting rights and elections, and risks to voters and elections in the US 24 context.
• Prepare memos and analyses as requested and agreed upon.
• Collaborate with the Civil Rights Team to instill civil rights best practices on voting and elections within the company.
• Contribute relevant voting rights and elections analysis, research, and content to documents and other resources.
• Develop and support voting and elections priorities and strategic projects.
• Support engagements with other voting and elections experts.

What is more intriguing is the minimum qualifications. Meta requires a JD for this software development position. That could be due to job listing regulations, but reading its mission statement may provide alternative insight.

At Meta, we have a responsibility to everyone who uses our services to amplify the good and mitigate the harm – to make sure that people are safe on Meta. Technology plays an enormous role in nearly every part of our lives, and it is important that it be used to overcome the historic discrimination which so many underrepresented groups have faced. Meta’s products and services serve communities all around the world. The question is no longer whether technology and social media play a role in elections and the civic ecosystem, but what forms they will take. The Civil Rights Team recognizes the potential to help increase voter participation and civic engagement, and to strengthen the values of equity, dignity, and safety as core to free expression and free and fair self-government. We also understand the elevated risk environment and the need to counter threats to voting and elections, particularly when targeted at systematically marginalized communities.

The move by Meta’s Facebook comes on the heels of another Big Tech announcement. According to The Jerusalem Post, X CTO Elon Musk will be visiting Auschwitz to lead a panel on antisemitism and the Holocaust. It will be hosted by the staunch Zionist Ben Shapiro of The Daily Wire.

The Post stated that this discussion will be to “combat rising antisemitism in light of the war in Gaza.” Unironically, months before, during the #BanTheADL campaign, America First journalists reported on Shapiro being the springboard for Musk to censor anti-Zionists.

Elon Musk, the richest man alive, has likely succumbed to the regime. The X platform will then likely adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, which includes anti-Zionism. This will render any pro-Palestine talk off-limits.

At this point, finding a social media platform that doesn’t hinder free speech behind a political agenda is almost impossible. The Christian platform, Gab, is the only one to remain.

Related: Establishment Crucifies Musk Over Jewish Antiwhitism Post

With Facebook taking an active approach to political chatter, X was seemingly the only platform left. But now, it will most likely resemble the latter in censorship and deboosting.

The lead-up to the 2024 presidential elections appears to be already saturated in the corporate agenda—ill-representative of the populace’s voice. This will likely be how the future of politics manifests as free speech continues to be in decline.

Related: Corporate Media Targets Social Media Amid Falling Support for Israel

Since the October 7th attack against Israel by Hamas, Zionists have been pressuring the American public to support the war with possible U.S. intervention. PragerU, a neoconservative, Jewish-owned and operated “educational” resource, posted on X that anti-Zionism is antisemitism, leaving no unprejudiced stances against the foreign policy agenda that serves Israel.

Anti-Zionism = Antisemitism

— PragerU (@prageru) December 28, 2023

Related: Dennis Prager Says Bisexuality is ‘The Norm’

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which many Jewish conservatives have rebuked as “leftists” and not “Jewish,” has longed to establish anti-Zionism as antisemitism in accordance with the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). Its working definition is certainly broad and, of course, includes anti-Zionism.

This conflating of anti-Zionism with antisemitism has been the ultimate crutch for the Zionist agenda, although support for US intervention continues to dwindle despite corporate media’s unabashed cheerleading.

Recall only a few months ago, during the #BanTheADL campaign, this appeared as a censorship problem. The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro ushered a space with Elon Musk and nine Jewish leaders to discuss “antisemitism, faith and free speech.”

The two-hour space was purely dedicated to antisemitism, as the nine explicitly told the owner of X that he simply didn’t understand the “sensitively of the Jewish people.”

Here's an edited version of the @benshapiro @elonmusk space on Antisemitism and free speech.

This version removes the long pause at the beginning, weird transitions, pauses, etc.

This version is ~30% shorter and flows better.

Thanks @DavidCarbutt_ and team for the work! pic.twitter.com/Me2koBqJKN

— Farzad (@farzyness) September 29, 2023

Rabbi Menachem Margolin of the European Jewish Association (EJA) insisted on the IHRA’s working definition and for the billionaire to visit the Auschwitz concentration camp to demonstrate “antisemitism and what it could lead to.”

Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the Associate Dean and Director of Global Social Action for the Simon Wiesenthal Center, then pressured Musk further on the “nuanced” definition. Cooper even claimed the Holocaust could happen again through “organized hate, a crisis, and technology …”

Musk agreed with the working definition but hasn’t implemented such a policy. It would essentially eliminate all opposition to the Zionists and the war in the Middle East that doesn’t have a drip of American agenda.

Anti-Zionism is antisemitism.

— Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) October 23, 2023

This is pure, unadulterated abuse of power by a particular interest group and their compadres, making them and their concerns, including American foreign policy, immune to all criticism and any true public discourse.

There are multiple Jewish anti-Zionist NGOs that promoted the idea of an “antisemitic racket.” Still, their funding is minimal compared to Zionist nonprofits.

Related: Establishment Crucifies Musk Over Jewish Antiwhitism Post

There is also the fact that most Republicans are neoconservatives, an ideology that began primarily as a Jewish movement pitching Israel as “morally exceptional.” So, it is very likely that the IHRA’s working definition will be implemented in the future, especially due to the conflict in the Middle East and its growing negative appeal to the American public.

Related: Corporate Media Targets Social Media Amid Falling Support for Israel